.
IOS issue seems plausible.
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:41 PM
To: Reuben Farrelly
Cc: Chuck Church; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
After running for most of the days
-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
After running for most of the days, things are back to getting mainly
process switched. ?? Strange.
rtr2811#sh int fa0/1 stats
FastEthernet0/1
Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
explain the NTP issue. Maybe even the performance issue.
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 5:10 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Yea, I'll give
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
Yea, I'll give the upgrade ago. I gotta schedule it out. In the meantime,
I'm parshing through debug ip packet data to see what is being process
switched. I set the debug
That cef command was pretty useful. Before you scroll down to the
output/stats, here are the only two
bugs that look like they might be related to my issue. With test #1,
(everything disabled), it was ALL
process switched. Test #2 looks slightly better with only IP
virtual-reassembly enabled.
After running for most of the days, things are back to getting mainly
process switched. ?? Strange.
rtr2811#sh int fa0/1 stats
FastEthernet0/1
Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
Processor3366529 213364344 66121 21868973
:43 PM
*To:* Chuck Church
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
Chuck,
Interesting. Not sure why it was so low. I switched back to this new ISP
conn on fa0/1 tonight and ran some more tests. Below
,
** **
Chuck
** **
*From:* Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:43 PM
*To:* Chuck Church
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
Chuck,
Interesting. Not sure
of weirdness
on an 870 ISR running 12.4(24)T.
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 12:09 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; vi...@abellohome.ne
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
...@abellohome.ne
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
The fa0/1 interface literally plugs into the cable modem for the ISP. Do
you think I should increase the buffer size a bit for that interface? I'm
sure there is a command for that. I added another sh
, December 22, 2011 12:09 PM
*To:* Chuck Church
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; vi...@abellohome.ne
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
** **
The fa0/1 interface literally plugs into the cable modem for the ISP. Do
you think I should increase the buffer
switching, and I think it'll get better.
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:32 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Just some stats in regards to the process
The command:
router#show ip cef switching statistics feature
Will show you which feature is causing traffic to be punted to CPU.
Reuben
On 23/12/2011 7:42 AM, Chuck Church wrote:
You're on the right path. The more important number is the packets in/out,
as opposed to the characters. Look
again. Just curious, what does 'sh buffer' output look like?
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
buffer' output look like?
Thanks,
Chuck
From: Jmail Clist [mailto:jmlis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Chuck Church
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Chuck
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jmail Clist
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 11:42 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
I have attached another log called latest_2811_logs. it contains the sh ip
traffic, sh int switching and a show proc cpu
Clist
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 11:42 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
I have attached another log called latest_2811_logs. it contains the sh
ip traffic, sh int switching and a show proc cpu sorted 1min output
: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Here is a show proc, show ip traffic and show int switching. Any feedback
is very much appreciated.
rtr2811#show proc cpu sorted 1min
CPU utilization for five seconds: 26%/17%; one minute: 13%; five minutes:
13%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked
: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Here is a show proc, show ip traffic and show int switching. Any feedback
is very much appreciated.
rtr2811#show proc cpu sorted 1min
CPU utilization for five seconds: 26%/17%; one minute: 13%; five
Hello,
I have an issue that is really causing me grief. I recentely inherited a
small network. There is an existing 1.5mbps Internet connection (fa0/0)
(includes MPLS as well/same provider). We added a new ISP that allows for
50mb down/5mb up. I added the new ISP to fa0/1 and modified the NAT
-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Hello,
I have an issue that is really causing me grief. I recentely inherited a
small network. There is an existing 1.5mbps Internet connection (fa0/0)
(includes MPLS as well/same provider). We added a new ISP
I saw a 2811 flattened recently by MTU / MSS issues, so
would be curious to see show ip traffic
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
The provider is using compression to get you the 50/5 number. The 2811
represents the true bandwidth allocation.
Did they ask you to go to a provider site to optimize your laptop?
Verizon did that to me, they told me I have 25 symteric although
I only get 8 symetric when I use my *NIX box to
Thanks for the replies. I actually had the interface set to AUTO first and
it did negotiate at 100mbps full duplex as well but the performance results
were the same. At the moment I am back on the legacy 1.5mbps connection. I
will cut it over tonight and perform some testing again. i will then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike,
I don't believe Verizon FiOS uses compression. Neither would the Windows
machine plugged directly into the hand off, so it would not compress or
decompress data in communicating with Verizon's hardware. Compression of an
entire link is CPU
10:57:11 -0600
From: Jmail Clist jmlis...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
Message-ID:
CAO8NJwLyKmQj8jUJTYg2_82fyxyyQLRuCOraaeH3BG9ONPr8=q...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hello,
I
Vinny,
I agree, now that I think about it, it would not be compression but my *NIX
box does support
auto scaling, that has be available for some time. I also am familiar with
stack tuning and have done
so on my box. However, most modern stacks do not require as much as the old
days, again, I
performance issue - dual(new) isp
Message-ID:
CAO8NJwLyKmQj8jUJTYg2_82fyxyyQLRuCOraaeH3BG9ONPr8=
q...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Hello,
I have an issue that is really causing me grief. I recentely inherited a
small network. There is an existing 1.5mbps
.
From: Christopher J. Wargaski war...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2011 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 performance issue - dual(new) isp
According to
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools
29 matches
Mail list logo
