Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-05 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote: out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer greatly. I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it can impact the router

[c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-04 Thread Mark Mason
We are planning on terminating dual OC3 point-to-point circuits (PA-POS-2OC3) from different carriers on 7201 NPE-G2's at two of our DC's and do either HDLC CEF per packet load-balancing or multilink PPP bundle together. What are some of the questions and responses from the field for anyone who

Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-04 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Mark Mason wrote: We are planning on terminating dual OC3 point-to-point circuits (PA-POS-2OC3) from different carriers on 7201 NPE-G2's at two of our DC's and do either HDLC CEF per packet load-balancing or multilink PPP bundle together. What are some of the questions and

Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-04 Thread arulgobinath emmanuel
out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer greatly. I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it can impact the router performance buffer space. Gobinath On Tue, Apr 5, 2011