: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derick
Winkworth
Sent: 19 October 2008 15:29
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure
Do you see giants incrementing on either interface?
Mohammed Dado wrote:
Dears,
We're configuring EIGRP
Do you see giants incrementing on either interface?
Mohammed Dado wrote:
Dears,
We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router
are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs ..
128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1)
Dears,
We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router
are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs ..
128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1) 100: Neighbor
10.253.225.38 (GigabitEthernet1/31.101) is up: new adjacency
If you are running older IOS code the K value mismatch could be the router
misinterpreting the goodbye message sent by EIGRP.
Hope this helps.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Mohammed Dado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dears,
We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure
Dears,
We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer
router are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs ..
128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1) 100:
Neighbor