Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-21 Thread Derick Winkworth
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derick Winkworth Sent: 19 October 2008 15:29 Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure Do you see giants incrementing on either interface? Mohammed Dado wrote: Dears, We're configuring EIGRP

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-19 Thread Derick Winkworth
Do you see giants incrementing on either interface? Mohammed Dado wrote: Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs .. 128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1)

[c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-18 Thread Mohammed Dado
Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs .. 128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1) 100: Neighbor 10.253.225.38 (GigabitEthernet1/31.101) is up: new adjacency

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-18 Thread Greg Wendel
If you are running older IOS code the K value mismatch could be the router misinterpreting the goodbye message sent by EIGRP. Hope this helps. On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Mohammed Dado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-18 Thread Mark Mckillop (mmckillo)
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs .. 128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1) 100: Neighbor