Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-25 Thread Lamar Owen
On the original subject of Trains Difference, here's an obscure one for you. I'm running four routers on an OC3 WAN link, and am running 1+1 APS at both ends. One end has a 12012 and a 7507; the other end has a 7507 and a 7401ASR. The 7401ASR and the 7507 on the far end are running 12.4

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-21 Thread Phil Mayers
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:52:59PM +, Martin Moens wrote: On Friday, 20 February, 2009 00:50 Justin Shore wrote: Jared Mauch wrote: another 'new' download area? as bad as the rejig they gave it last time? :-( Worse You now have to navigate a tree that may or may not tell you

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-21 Thread Michael Lambert
On 19 Feb 2009, at 20:55, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote: I am thinking that there is belief that customers need wizards to assist them. Agreed. Anyone who is responsible for, say, 7200s and above should be able to download images using FTP (or find a new line of work). Michael

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-21 Thread Elmar K. Bins
lamb...@psc.edu (Michael Lambert) wrote: On 19 Feb 2009, at 20:55, Buhrmaster, Gary wrote: I am thinking that there is belief that customers need wizards to assist them. Agreed. Anyone who is responsible for, say, 7200s and above should be able to download images using FTP (or find a

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On Saturday 21 February 2009 03:52:59 am Martin Moens wrote: Cisco, ***PLEASE*** don't do this to us! Leave the original interface intact! Apart from Justin's remarks, it is so very slow If they can also fix the search dialog box on the homepage, that would be great. When you try to

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-20 Thread Martin Moens
On Friday, 20 February, 2009 00:50 Justin Shore wrote: Jared Mauch wrote: another 'new' download area? as bad as the rejig they gave it last time? :-( Worse You now have to navigate a tree that may or may not tell you anything useful. Yeah, it's awful. And you can't sort by

[c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Hi All I'd like to know the differneces between IOS trains according to your experices with them SXI , SXH , SXF and SXD best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Phil Mayers
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:34:06AM +, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: Hi All I'd like to know the differneces between IOS trains according to your experices with them SXI , SXH , SXF and SXD Age. Seriously though, that's a big question. Can you narrow it down a bit? If you really do want to

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Hi All I'd like to know the differneces between IOS trains according to your experices with them SXI , SXH , SXF and SXD ouch. such a wide ranging question! as Phil says, look at the SX release notes for particular features and capabilities, but basic run-through SXD - old and

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Mark Mckillop (mmckillo)
: Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:34:06AM +, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: Hi All I'd like to know the differneces between IOS trains according to your experices with them SXI , SXH , SXF and SXD Age. Seriously though, that's a big question. Can you narrow it down a bit

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Ibrahim Abo Zaid
...@groupstudy.com; cisco_nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:34:06AM +, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: Hi All I'd like to know the differneces between IOS trains according to your experices with them SXI , SXH , SXF and SXD Age. Seriously though, that's a big

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, like is each train runs over spesific platforms ? standard supported features sets ? recommended deployment senarios , SP ,Data ceneter . etc .. ah! well, if you are looking at different platforms and scenarios then it isnt just a case of SX either - for example, you've then got SR or SB

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Jared Mauch
On Feb 19, 2009, at 8:58 AM, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: Hi, like is each train runs over spesific platforms ? standard supported features sets ? recommended deployment senarios , SP ,Data ceneter . etc .. ah! well, if you are looking at different platforms and scenarios then it isnt

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Phil Mayers
Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: Thanks all to your replies but my question was about the major differences like is each train runs over spesific platforms ? standard supported features sets ? recommended deployment senarios , SP ,Data ceneter . etc .. No. They're all trains for the 6500. SXH and

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Justin Shore
Jared Mauch wrote: another 'new' download area? as bad as the rejig they gave it last time? :-( Worse You now have to navigate a tree that may or may not tell you anything useful. Yeah, it's awful. And you can't sort by mainline release for all platforms anymore. I can't find

Re: [c-nsp] IOS Trains differnces

2009-02-19 Thread Buhrmaster, Gary
Yeah, it's awful. I am thinking that there is belief that customers need wizards to assist them. I presume Cisco has spent a lot of money on focus group studies to decide that we are all idiots and want and need their assistance with downloads (and do not mind that it takes five times longer