Just want to drop a note of gratitude to all who replied me online and offline.
Think the general consensus of this straw poll is that:
1. yes, ddos traffic is and should be chargable, and rightly so, to be
fair to ISPs
2. *simple* filtering of ddos traffic should a ISP obligation, and
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Hock Jim wrote:
1. yes, ddos traffic is and should be chargable, and rightly so, to be
fair to ISPs
This is actually one of the strongest rationales for customers to
consider purchasing 'Clean Pipes'-type DDoS mitigation services from
their SP(s), second in
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:58:21AM +0800, Hock Jim wrote:
Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but hoping to seek some advise on
what is typically the case for ISP response in the case of a DDOS.
In the case of a DDOS attack that saturates an upstream, typically:
1. will the ISP charge
On 3 Sep 2007, at 03:58, Hock Jim wrote:
Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but hoping to seek some advise on
what is typically the case for ISP response in the case of a DDOS.
its fine but check out nanog which is more Internet operational than
here..
In the case of a DDOS attack that
Hello all,
Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but hoping to seek some advise on
what is typically the case for ISP response in the case of a DDOS.
In the case of a DDOS attack that saturates an upstream, typically:
1. will the ISP charge (based on 95% percentile) for the days or hours
where the
