to only support ~50 DSL tails, and also have a limited budget - Are there
any alternatives to the 7200's that we can use for the above tasks? (Maybe
a 2800 or 2900?
We had a few 2821's running as LNS's ok in the past. Between 200 and
350 PPP sessions, OSPF, vrf-lite, 256 mem and hitting
Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot
Sent: October-15-10 12:19 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] LNS alternative to 7200?
Hi,
We have a bunch of 7200's currently terminating dsl tails(Also doing
mpls/vrf's etc) - We
viable and cost-effective approach; any ideas if this package would
support L2TPv3? or if there is another open-source package that would do
L2TPv3?
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--
On 10/15/10 8:44 AM, Tom Devries wrote:
The CPU was way
Hi,
We have a bunch of 7200's currently terminating dsl tails(Also doing mpls/vrf's
etc) - We are rolling out a new site, and have an initial
requirement(6-12months) to only support ~50 DSL tails, and also have a limited
budget - Are there any alternatives to the 7200's that we can use for
We are doing just this with a couple of 2851's - MPLS/BGP/OSPF/IPv6/NAT for a
small POP. The one 2851 I have in mind is maxed out with 1G third party
approved DRAM and also runs a full BGP table. Initially after boot it takes a
little while to munge the full BGP feed (3 or 4 mins from memory)
We are doing just this with a couple of 2851's - MPLS/BGP/OSPF/IPv6/NAT for a
small POP. The one 2851 I have in mind is maxed out with 1G third party
approved DRAM and also runs a full BGP table. Initially after boot it takes a
little while to munge the full BGP feed (3 or 4 mins from
