: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:50 AM
To: Frank Bulk - iName.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
I have 5 remote sites where I'm doing FTTH and transporting the traffic
over
a third-party transport gear to our
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
I have 5 remote sites where I'm doing FTTH and transporting the traffic over
a third-party transport gear to our HQ. Each site-HQ link is a separate
VLAN and uniquely numbered.
Have you considered re-tagging the VLANs on a cheaper device
I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco
7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use the
same group of subnets for each VLAN and I tried using loopbacks but it
doesn't work. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?
interface Loopback 2
ip dhcp
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco
7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use the
same group of subnets for each VLAN and I tried using loopbacks but it
doesn't work. Any ideas
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 08:30 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a
Cisco 7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like
to use the same group of subnets for each
: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 20:19
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question
I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco
7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use
the
same group of subnets for each VLAN and I tried
: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
I have several uniquely numbered 802.1q tagged links coming into a Cisco
7609-S (12.2(33)SRB3) on a single physical port. I would like to use the
same group of subnets for each VLAN and I tried using loopbacks
the L3-broadcast traffic.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:avay...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:32 PM
To: frnk...@iname.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question
Frank,
Can you please explain what do you want
, December 15, 2009 21:56
To: Arie Vayner (avayner); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question
I have 5 remote sites where I'm doing FTTH and transporting the traffic
over
a third-party transport gear to our HQ. Each site-HQ link is a separate
VLAN and uniquely numbered. My
@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Loopback/VLAN question
Frank,
The right way to solve it would be to use the ES20 (or more actually the
more recent ES+) modules.
This would allow you to create a separate EVC/EFP (service-instance) per
site, using whatever VLAN IDs (even reusing them, or using
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
Looks like I will be creating separate L3 domains.
If you can live with knowing what part of the IP pool belongs in what vlan
then you can (this works with static addresses (no dhcp) anyway) route the
individual parts of the unnumbered
11 matches
Mail list logo
