Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-10 Thread Keegan Holley
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Phil Bedard phil...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah hence the ellipses and the recommendation to maybe look elsewhere. :) It is definitely feature overkill for someone looking for a L2 switch with ample fiber termination, but if you are dead set to go Cisco and do not

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-09 Thread Keegan Holley
I'm not sure I really care about all the features. From the pricing I saw it's dirt cheap for what it does. I just want something that operates close enough to a real switch that I can use it in a LAN environment and not become a human FAQ. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Mark Tinka

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-09 Thread Per Carlson
Hi. I'm looking at the new 3600X series it was just released in Sept.  I noticed the no local switching for UNI ports.  Is there a way to disable the UNI/NNI relationship completely or enable local switching for UNI ports? That might be true if you run the UNI-ports as switchports. OTOH you

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-09 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 03:56:22 pm Keegan Holley wrote: I'm not sure I really care about all the features. From the pricing I saw it's dirt cheap for what it does. I just want something that operates close enough to a real switch that I can use it in a LAN environment and not

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-09 Thread Abello, Vinny
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Edward Salonia Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 6:33 PM To: Andrew Koch; cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net; Keegan Holley Cc: Cisco NSPs Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm Correct. In older versions of the IOS you were limited to the number of nni ports

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-09 Thread Phil Bedard
Yeah hence the ellipses and the recommendation to maybe look elsewhere. :) It is definitely feature overkill for someone looking for a L2 switch with ample fiber termination, but if you are dead set to go Cisco and do not want something chassis based... Phil On 12/9/10 2:12 AM, Mark Tinka

[c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Keegan Holley
I know from previous conversations that the architecture as well as some of the defaults for the ME series are different than the traditional switching platforms. I was curious if there were any reasons why I shouldn't use them in a vanilla switching environment such as a LAN or a server farm. I

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Salonia
One thing to watch for is that there is no local switching among UNI ports. You could either set your port type to NNI or you could set the vlan as a community vlan to enable local switching. What platforms were you looking at? ME3400, 3750ME? You should take note that the ME3400 series doesn't

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Andrew Koch
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 16:50, Edward Salonia e...@edgeoc.net wrote: One thing to watch for is that there is no local switching among UNI ports. You could either set your port type to NNI or you could set the vlan as a community vlan to enable local switching. Double check the specs on these.

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Jeremy Bresley
On 12/8/2010 1:44 PM, Keegan Holley wrote: I know from previous conversations that the architecture as well as some of the defaults for the ME series are different than the traditional switching platforms. I was curious if there were any reasons why I shouldn't use them in a vanilla switching

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Salonia
: Cisco NSPscisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 16:50, Edward Salonia e...@edgeoc.net wrote: One thing to watch for is that there is no local switching among UNI ports. You could either set your port type to NNI or you could set the vlan

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Keegan Holley
I'm looking at the new 3600X series it was just released in Sept. I noticed the no local switching for UNI ports. Is there a way to disable the UNI/NNI relationship completely or enable local switching for UNI ports? On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Edward Salonia e...@edgeoc.net wrote: One

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 9/12/2010 10:28 AM, Jeremy Bresley wrote: On 12/8/2010 1:44 PM, Keegan Holley wrote: I know from previous conversations that the architecture as well as some of the defaults for the ME series are different than the traditional switching platforms. I was curious if there were any reasons why

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Phil Bedard
3600X might be an option, otherwise there are other vendors with cheaper L2-switch-only products with 24+ SFP ports on them. The Nexus 5548 has 1G support coming sometime in the near future, so if you are looking to buy further down the line it might be an option. The older 5010/5020 models

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread ML
On 12/8/2010 6:32 PM, Edward Salonia wrote: Correct. In older versions of the IOS you were limited to the number of nni ports but that has changed. The limit is 4 NNIs in the METROBASE image and unlimited in the IPACCESS image. There is an ACCESS image in between BASE and IPACCESS it may

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 09/12/2010 00:05, Phil Bedard wrote: The Nexus 5548 has 1G support coming sometime in the near future, so if you are looking to buy further down the line it might be an option. The older 5010/5020 models have limited 1G support (only on first 16 ports if I recall correctly) ObWarning:

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

2010-12-08 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, December 09, 2010 08:05:49 am Phil Bedard wrote: 3600X might be an option,... For the application the OP is looking at, the ME3600X/3800X might be overkill. It's a very powerful switch, bordering on a real router. I'd keep things simple unless the OP needs all these features.