Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-15 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 15/12/2011 1:58 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: On Thursday, December 15, 2011 07:33:32 AM Reuben Farrelly wrote: Yikes. I don't have this problem in my deployment so far as I have pushed this job onto edge routers to do this function on all ingress/egress points to our network. Are you saying you

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-15 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 05:05:43 PM Reuben Farrelly wrote: Yes - but not on this platform. I have the switches within our IGP and the edges (both CPE and at the other end - transit+peering) are on IOS software based routers which don't have this problem. Yes, that's right. We have

[c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Reuben Farrelly
I took the plunge and have now gradually upgraded 5 ME3600X units in production to 15.1(2a)EY1a software which was released a couple of weeks ago. So far: - IPv6 is in, enabled, and it works well carrying 50+ prefixes and OSPFv3 within our AS. Not a hugely taxing environment, but IPv6

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 04:57:30 PM Reuben Farrelly wrote: I took the plunge and have now gradually upgraded 5 ME3600X units in production to 15.1(2a)EY1a software which was released a couple of weeks ago. So I decided to join you and try the new release and see whether it fits us

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question} I took the plunge and have now gradually upgraded 5 ME3600X units in production to 15.1(2a)EY1a software which was released a couple of weeks ago. So far: - IPv6 is in, enabled

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 15/12/2011 4:06 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: - IPv6 is in, enabled, and it works well carrying 50+ prefixes and OSPFv3 within our AS. Not a hugely taxing environment, but IPv6 works. I tested IPv6 - yes, it's enabled but massively broken: ... o As much as every bone in my body was

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 15/12/2011 10:33 AM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: - We also need to be able to see and graph interface counters for each EVC/VLAN for Cacti/Solarwinds (at present this does not work on VLAN interfaces) Now: sw1.qld#show ethernet service instance detail Service Instance ID: 780 Service Instance

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 07:33:32 AM Reuben Farrelly wrote: Yikes. I don't have this problem in my deployment so far as I have pushed this job onto edge routers to do this function on all ingress/egress points to our network. Are you saying you have egress ACL's applied on dual-stack

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS 15.1(2a)EY1a Code: [Was: Re: Cisco ME3600X and Bridge-Domain Routing config question}

2011-12-14 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 09:29:59 AM Reuben Farrelly wrote: Bad form to reply to myself but for the record, anyone else who is looking for this - EVCs show up as an SNMP pollable interface in their own right: IF-MIB::ifDescr.20507 = STRING: GigabitEthernet0/15.ServiceInstance.780