On 12/10/2009 05:20, Mark Tinka wrote:
increasing bandwidth is probably more practical than
implementing QoS
or as some wags state differently: QoS really means quantity of service,
because quality of service only ever becomes an issue if there is a
shortage of quantity.
On Saturday 10 October 2009 07:01:00 am Peter Rathlev wrote:
Just enabling mls qos without doing anything else and
without having a plan should be considered an error.
I can attest to this.
I know a network that couldn't figure out why its customer's
traffic was having their ToS byte being
Hello,
please could anybody explain the diffrence when 6500/7600 running with
MLS QoS enabled (mls qos) and when running with MLS QoS disabled no
mls qos ?
Regards,
David
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Granzer
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 13:58
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] MLS QoS 6500/7600
Hello,
please could anybody explain the diffrence when 6500/7600 running with
MLS QoS enabled (mls qos) and when running
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 13:58 +0200, David Granzer wrote:
please could anybody explain the diffrence when 6500/7600 running with
MLS QoS enabled (mls qos) and when running with MLS QoS disabled no
mls qos ?
Here's a relatively compact and quite good explanation of 6500 QoS:
