Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

2016-06-09 Thread Curtis Piehler
Thanks for the explanation guys. On Jun 9, 2016 8:44 PM, "Adam Vitkovsky" wrote: > > Curtis Piehler > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 7:35 PM > > > > I have quite a scenario here that we are working on testing in the lab > but > > wanted to know if anyone has

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

2016-06-09 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
> Curtis Piehler > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 7:35 PM > > I have quite a scenario here that we are working on testing in the lab but > wanted to know if anyone has experience in this. > > In this scenario there are a few PE routers (ASR9K) connected to each other > with a "firewall" connecting

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

2016-06-09 Thread Lukas Tribus
> So I'm confused a bit then. Once the label pops it sees a next hop > in that VRF aware router and will get imported into that VRF no? No. There are no VRF imports, no IP based actions on an LSR, even when you call the box a PE. The intermediate nodes just swaps one transport label with

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

2016-06-09 Thread Lukas Tribus
> If the packet ends up traversing PE routers that are VRF aware of the > customer on it's way to that final PE router will the in between PE routers > pop the labels and subject the packet to normal VPNV4 routing table instead > of just label switching entirely to the final PE router? No,

[c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

2016-06-09 Thread Curtis Piehler
I have quite a scenario here that we are working on testing in the lab but wanted to know if anyone has experience in this. In this scenario there are a few PE routers (ASR9K) connected to each other with a "firewall" connecting to one of the PE routers. Two different PE routers have a customer