28.09.2020 20:00, Aaron wrote:
> Unfortunately no.
Thanks!
In case someone's curious, I did it at 7:00 early in the morning,
the whole thing lasted for 30 seconds with 100% load of CPU processing
352KB of incremental configuration pre-loaded to flash: device
and then applied with: copy
28.09.2020 20:00, Aaron wrote:
> Unfortunately no.
Funny thing, I had very old sub-interface created just for testing:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.2239
encapsulation dot1Q 2239
xconnect X.X.X.X 239 encapsulation l2tpv3 manual pw-class MyPeer
l2tp id 239 239
l2tp cookie local 4 239
l2tp
Unfortunately no.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:50 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 28.09.2020 17:12, James Bensley wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein
> wrote:
> >> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses
> only two,
> >> one for IP uplink and another
28.09.2020 17:12, James Bensley wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only two,
>> one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple
>> sub-interfaces named like
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only two,
> one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple
> sub-interfaces named like GigabitEthernet0/1.10 (encapsulation dot1Q).
>
> It
28.09.2020 15:20, c...@marenda.net wrote:
>
> I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] .
>
> Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports
> while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel
> ethernetcontrollerchip
> (with gig+(only)fas they
I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] .
Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports
while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel
ethernetcontrollerchip
(with gig+(only)fas they try tonot oversubscribe the internal pci bus )
>
Hi!
One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only two,
one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple
sub-interfaces named like GigabitEthernet0/1.10 (encapsulation dot1Q).
It need reconfiguration to use 2x1G port-channles. I already did such
