Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

> Saku Ytti > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:50 AM > > On 24 May 2017 at 09:32, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > Personally, I'd still prefer IOS XE on the ASR920. IOS XR is a little > > bloated, and to keep the ASR920 competitive, I don't think it will > > make sense to increase

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

On 24 May 2017 at 09:32, Mark Tinka wrote: > Personally, I'd still prefer IOS XE on the ASR920. IOS XR is a little > bloated, and to keep the ASR920 competitive, I don't think it will make > sense to increase hardware resources needed to run IOS XR. Just add commit to

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

On 4/26/17 9:23 AM, George Giannousopoulos wrote: > Hi, > > Concerning IOS-XR on ASR-900 series, during a recent meeting with Cisco we > were told that it's coming with RSP4.. > Haven't heard anything for the ASR920 though.. Personally, I'd still prefer IOS XE on the ASR920. IOS XR is a little

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

On 4/25/17 8:22 AM, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > Perhaps it will take the place of the ME3800X? The ME3800X still has larger resources than an ME3600X, which is on par with the ASR920. I suspect a newer ASR9x0 will replace the ME3800X. Mark. ___

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Sundberg > Cc: Pete Templin; Gert Doering; CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? > > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:21:51PM +, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > I just had a presentation on this. > > > >

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

. From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of quinn snyder <snyd...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 6:23 AM To: Gert Doering Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:36 PM,

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

oering; CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:21:51PM +, Erik Sundberg wrote: > I just had a presentation on this. > > Sounded like the ASR920 AKA Rebranded as the NCS4200 will be running the

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

ie.muc.de>; CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com> Kopia: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? I just had a presentation on this. Sounded like the ASR920 AKA Rebranded as the NCS4200 will be running the NCS Code. Sounded like same hardwa

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Now the interesting question is, of course, *which* NCS code... as there > seem to be a number of different "NCS*" families. > > An ASR920-style device with IOS XR on it, and actually doing all the > nice XR things,

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

NCS code ? Going off what I know of the NCS5x00 it runs IOS XR 6.x So I guess that would be different from the 920 since I recall it ran XE -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Maybe it's to generate more sales... Like the reese's peanut butter cup was good, but wait til you try the reese's peanut butter egg. ... LOL -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Perhaps similar to what juniper does with the following... juniper acx5048 https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information -products/pathway-pages/acx-series/acx5000/ juniper qfx5100 https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:21:51PM +, Erik Sundberg wrote: > I just had a presentation on this. > > Sounded like the ASR920 AKA Rebranded as the NCS4200 will be running the NCS > Code. Sounded like same hardware. > > Also thinking it's more of a product switch to fill out the NCS

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pete Templin Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 10:09 AM To: Gert Doering; CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? Or the Nexus 5010 vs. UCS Fabric Interconnect debacle? I think there's one extra CPU/ASIC

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Or the Nexus 5010 vs. UCS Fabric Interconnect debacle? I think there's one extra CPU/ASIC on the board of the FIs, and the paint color is different, but the code is different. On 4/25/17 4:24 AM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:06:33AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: If

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 2:46 AM To: Ted Johansson <ted.johans...@tele2.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:07:11AM +, Ted Johansson wrote: > The ASR900 series will not be replaced by NCS4200, bo

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:06:33AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: > If feature parity between the 2 are identicalIt makes no sense? Look at the history of the 6500/7600 split... Starting out with identical hardware, just differently coloured, sold by different BUs. Then start

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

iginal Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent: den 25 april 2017 06:05 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? Just noticed these on Cisco's site - They appear to be just re-badged ASR920/AS

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:07:11AM +, Ted Johansson wrote: > The ASR900 series will not be replaced by NCS4200, both series will co-exist. Sounds like the BUs suddenly remembered how much the customers appreciated the 6500/7600 split, and wanted to re-enact that great success again.

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

er.net] On Behalf Of > > CiscoNSP List > > Sent: den 25 april 2017 06:05 > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? > > > > Just noticed these on Cisco's site - They appear to be just re-badged > > ASR920/ASR900's? (

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

sco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > CiscoNSP List > Sent: den 25 april 2017 06:05 > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? > > Just noticed these on Cisco's site - They appear to be just re-badged > AS

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

- re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ? Just noticed these on Cisco's site - They appear to be just re-badged ASR920/ASR900's? (They even use ASR920 power supplies etc) Anyone have any info on them? Is this Cisco discretely releasing a "new" ASR920/900 that supports Laeba-based chips perhaps,

[c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Just noticed these on Cisco's site - They appear to be just re-badged ASR920/ASR900's? (They even use ASR920 power supplies etc) Anyone have any info on them? Is this Cisco discretely releasing a "new" ASR920/900 that supports Laeba-based chips perhaps, and ASR900/920 will be "replaced"?