[c-nsp] Pros/cons of ip nat list vs route-map

2007-07-30 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, Recently I've gotten more into doing NAT at sites. I've noticed that it seems that when customers use the GUI, it does something like : ip nat inside source list 2 interface Serial0/1/0 overload access-list 2 remark SDM_ACL Category=18 access-list 2 permit 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255

Re: [c-nsp] Pros/cons of ip nat list vs route-map

2007-07-30 Thread Stephen Wilcox
Hi Tuc, can you provide a basic diagram, I'm confused reading the below. Also, what outside nat translations do you have that you are referring to Steve On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 02:36:23PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: Hi, Recently I've gotten more into doing NAT at sites. I've

Re: [c-nsp] Pros/cons of ip nat list vs route-map

2007-07-30 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi Steve, Alot of what I put was for example purposes only. I was mainly trying to find the pros/cons of the list X versus route-map Y in the ip nat inside source statement. I wandered a little bringing up my issue. BUT, if it maybe helps make things clearer