Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-08 Thread Lobo
Yes we've experienced that too. Swapping out the SFP doesn't fix it either and it requires a reboot to get the copper to work again on the same port. Jose On 9/5/2014 7:08 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 04/09/2014 19:41, Aaron wrote: after typing that global command, just shut/no shut the port

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-05 Thread Gustav UHLANDER
To: 'Lobo'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600 Have you tried the hidden global command... service unsupported-transceiver This worked for me when I couldn't get sfp's to work. My notes below... after typing that global command, just shut/no shut the port

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-05 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 04/09/2014 19:41, Aaron wrote: after typing that global command, just shut/no shut the port and it should immediately start working. you won't need to reboot me3600 nor will you need to reinsert the sfp. it will work. that usually works, but occasionally an ME3600 will get confused and

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-04 Thread Phil Mayers
On 03/09/2014 22:03, David Farrell wrote: On 02/09/2014 20:10, James Bensley wrote: I've used hundreads with no issues at all (with both insertion/removal and actual operation). I've had a few 1000BaseT SFPs, both Cisco-branded and otherwise, where the wee tab mechanism has broken and the

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-04 Thread Lobo
Similar issues here. The only 1000BaseT SFPs that we've gotten to work are the Cisco branded ones. Some of the other brands/manufacturers we've used have given mixed results. In one instance we had plugged in a 10/100/1000 SFP and tried connecting it to a Cisco 3750 FE port. The FE port on

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-04 Thread Aaron
GigabitEthernet0/23, changed state to up eng-lab-3600-2#sh int status err eng-lab-3600-2# Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lobo Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:48 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SFP's

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-03 Thread David Farrell
On 02/09/2014 20:10, James Bensley wrote: I've used hundreads with no issues at all (with both insertion/removal and actual operation). I've had a few 1000BaseT SFPs, both Cisco-branded and otherwise, where the wee tab mechanism has broken and the 'release' isn't pushed in to allow the SFP to

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-02 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
...@hotmail.commailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com Date: Monday, September 1, 2014 at 5:12 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600 Hi Guys, Getting a number of ME3600's shortly (FS version) - We had

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-02 Thread Spyros Kakaroukas
Hello, I've got a few different 3rd party sfps on customer-facing interfaces in production. Never had any insertion/removal issues. On 2 Sep 2014 03:16, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Getting a number of ME3600's shortly (FS version) - We had some issues with third

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-02 Thread James Bensley
I've used hundreads with no issues at all (with both insertion/removal and actual operation). Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

2014-09-01 Thread CiscoNSP List
Hi Guys, Getting a number of ME3600's shortly (FS version) - We had some issues with third party copper SFP's in our 4500X's (They are nearly impossible to remove, once installed) - We ended up finding the NHR WIRE copper SFP's to work (Being able to remove them) - Are there any such issues