Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-28 Thread Christophe Lucas
Le 27/10/2011 20:41, Andrew K. a écrit : I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted to ping the community to see what has been successfully used in the field. Proving WAN services in a remote rural area we have several small POP sites providing minimal customers (some 10

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-28 Thread Lars Christensen
Me3750 has been announced EoS a few months ago. Therefore I don't recommend for new installations. BR Lars Den 28/10/2011 kl. 12.31 skrev Christophe Lucas c.lu...@infosat-telecom.fr: Le 27/10/2011 20:41, Andrew K. a écrit : I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-28 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, October 28, 2011 02:41:25 AM Andrew K. wrote: Anyone use anything smaller? If you're looking at something that's small and port-dense, you'll likely be looking at a Metro-E switch. The ME3750 is now EoS, but if you need a couple you may be able to still find some on the market.

[c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-27 Thread Andrew K.
I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted to ping the community to see what has been successfully used in the field. Proving WAN services in a remote rural area we have several small POP sites providing minimal customers (some 10 or less). We are looking to run MPLS

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-27 Thread Lars L. Christensen
You could take a look at the Metro Ethernet switches. Some of them might be suitable for your setup. Regards Lars Christensen CCIE #20292 Den 27-10-2011 20:41, Andrew K. skrev: I've been waiting for my SE to get back to me on this but I wanted to ping the community to see what has been

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-27 Thread Jon Harald Bøvre
http://www-au.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6557/prod_white_paper0900aecd8051fbdc.html 1841 (I would probably not use this in production as a SP) Also as Lars mentions: ME3600X Jon Harald Bøvre Sent from my iPad On 27. okt. 2011, at 20:59, Lars L. Christensen

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-27 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 14:41 -0400, Andrew K. wrote: From my digging around the smallest device I can see supporting these features would be a 2811. Anyone use anything smaller? The 2801 will do MPLS too, at least with Enterprise Services or larger feature set AFAICT. I assume smaller is

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-27 Thread Martin Moens
-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew K. Subject: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router From my digging around the smallest device I can see supporting these features would be a 2811. Anyone use

Re: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router

2011-10-27 Thread Blake Dunlap
Of Andrew K. Subject: [c-nsp] Smaller MPLS/EoMPLS capable router From my digging around the smallest device I can see supporting these features would be a 2811. Anyone use anything smaller? You could have a look at the ISR-G2 1921, it can handle much more traffic, is more recent (not nearing EoS