Hi,
hsrp + ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise + ipv6 nd ra suppress:
=
ra from each 'real' router - link local (2 default gateways)
autoconfig / prefix announcment is OFF (Yay !)
(A)
ipv6 nd ra suppress command stops MULTICAST
PPPS: 12.4T says it supports a global address for the HSRP ip ? I only
have the option of autoconfig or link-local on my 6500. Is this something
coming for Catalyst ?
SXI4 has it.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:00:09PM -0400, Brandon Applegate wrote:
PPPS: 12.4T says it supports a global address for the HSRP ip ? I only
have the option of autoconfig or link-local on my 6500. Is this something
coming for Catalyst ?
I remember that it had been announced, but I'm not
Brandon Applegate bran...@burn.net wrote:
[snipped]
The message from last month said that:
ipv6 nd ra suppress
ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise
Would stop machines from accidentially lighting up ipv6. This makes sense
to me, and I really like that solution for a pure static /
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:00:09PM -0400, Brandon Applegate wrote:
PPPS: 12.4T says it supports a global address for the HSRP ip ? I only
have the option of autoconfig or link-local on my 6500. Is this something
Alexander Clouter a...@digriz.org.uk wrote:
PPPS: 12.4T says it supports a global address for the HSRP ip ? I only
have the option of autoconfig or link-local on my 6500. Is this something
coming for Catalyst ?
I personally cannot think of a single reason why anyone would want to
Okay, I have read Cisco's reasoning[1], although I cannot still see why
it's necessary, but I'm not in the ISP/CPE business so my brain is not
currently wired for that sort of thinking...I would have expected IGP on
the next-hop to the customer router to have advertised the route.
Just that if
This was a thread from last month. I have just tonight decided to fire up
ipv6 on an interface facing some linux machines in the data center. I
don't have transit yet but I at least wanted to trace/ping over my own
backbone.
Before I go any further, much like the OP last month, I'm running
Hi,
If you're looking to stop the responses to solicitation as well, put in
both of these:
ipv6 nd ra suppress
ipv6 nd prefix default no-advertise
When setting Cat65, I was not checking the command ipv6 nd prefix.
I have not tested it yet. However, when the command reference is seen,
Thus spake daigo nakayama (nky...@gmail.com) on Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 07:57:51AM
+0900:
Hi,
Cat65 interface(GigabitEthernet) sent out RA, when RS was received in
the interface that applied ipv6 nd ra suppress. Is this behavior
within specification ?
If you're looking to stop the responses
Hi,
Cat65 interface(GigabitEthernet) sent out RA, when RS was received in
the interface that applied ipv6 nd ra suppress. Is this behavior
within specification ?
Catalyst6503
SUP720-3BXL
s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-vz.122-33.SXI3
I was not able to find a clear answer though I saw a similar
11 matches
Mail list logo
