- Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Not that IOS for Sup720 would run on non-Cisco hardware, so pirating
doesn't really make *that* much sense...
But there *could* be someone out there downloading new IOS who doesn't have a
support contract! That's *literally* stealing food from
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:50:40AM +, Tim Franklin wrote:
they're not selling as many support contracts as they think they
should, and have introduced the New Improved Download Experience
and the IOS 15 nodelocked licence clusterfuck.
Welcome to the future...
15.0S, anyone? :-)
But there *could* be someone out there downloading new IOS who doesn't
have a support contract! That's *literally* stealing food from the
mouths of Cisco coders!
In the same way as the music, movie and software industries decide
that
they're not selling as much as they think they should,
On 11/11/2010 10:50, Tim Franklin wrote:
But there *could* be someone out there downloading new IOS who doesn't
have a support contract! That's *literally* stealing food from the
mouths of Cisco coders!
There are legitimate ways of getting upgrades without a service contract in
place, the
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
How about 1pm CET and 1pm EST tomorrow?
*done*.
Calling TAC is amazingly convoluted. (I've never done that before, I
always open cases per web interface, so this was a new experience for
me - figuring out whether I'm entitled
How about 1pm CET and 1pm EST tomorrow?
Need to have 'two' waves I think, one for brussels and one for the folks in
SJ/RTP.
I do suggest opening a TAC Case, and as part of that (do it via the Phone IMHO)
ask about a Customer Management Board as it relates to the download process
changes.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
How about 1pm CET and 1pm EST tomorrow?
Works for me.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
