On Sun, 2 Feb 2014, Jeff Orr wrote:
If you are using a private MPLS (I.e. Not over Internet) have Cisco
CE routers consider GETVPN.
For the reasons you mentioned, we as a customer went this direction.
We needed to ensure our WAN (150 sites/multiple data centers)traveling
across a variety of
On 4 Feb 2014, at 10:30 am, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote:
Does that actually work over WAN links that are not just plain optical
paths? I have been wondering if you can get MacSec to work over EoMPLS.
It ‘just worked’ in the lab over EoMPLS, but I haven’t experienced it in
Ian Henderson i...@ianh.net.au writes:
What about MacSec? Works between 3560X/4500/4500X/Sup2T/etc for wire rate L2
encryption.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1/XE_330SG/configuration/guide/swmacsec.html#wp1334072
says:
Does that actually work over WAN links
that handles those two
Ethertypes, MACsec should run fine.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Benny Amorsen
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 5:31 PM
To: Ian Henderson
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Transparent
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt wrote:
Hello group,
Service Provider WAN links are not secure anymore and I have more and more
enterprise customer asking transparent WAN encryption solutions. I came
across these two products:
EncryptTight:
If you are using a private MPLS (I.e. Not over Internet) have Cisco
CE routers consider GETVPN.
For the reasons you mentioned, we as a customer went this direction.
We needed to ensure our WAN (150 sites/multiple data centers)traveling
across a variety of links/providers including
hey,
If you are using a private MPLS (I.e. Not over Internet) have Cisco
CE routers consider GETVPN.
There is no reason why you can't use GETVPN inside L3VPN. This is
exactly one use case for GETVPN and many people are using it successfully.
If you don't trust your provider at all,
2014 17:25
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Transparent WAN Encryption
If you are using a private MPLS (I.e. Not over Internet) have Cisco CE
routers consider GETVPN.
For the reasons you mentioned, we as a customer went this direction.
We needed to ensure our
...@netcabo.pt amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net/ http://www.ccie18473.net
From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eu...@imacandi.net]
Sent: domingo, 2 de Fevereiro de 2014 12:47
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Transparent WAN Encryption
On Sun, Feb 2
)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Orr [mailto:j...@communicorr.com]
Sent: domingo, 2 de Fevereiro de 2014 17:25
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Transparent WAN Encryption
If you are using
On 3 Feb 2014, at 8:10 am, Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt wrote:
I'm looking for the simplest way to do it. Most customers have L2
connections between Data Centers. The edge device controlled by the customer
is a Layer 2 Switch. The mechanisms like IPSec, GETVPN, FlexVPN, an so on,
need a
Hello group,
Service Provider WAN links are not secure anymore and I have more and more
enterprise customer asking transparent WAN encryption solutions. I came
across these two products:
EncryptTight:
http://www.blackbox.com/Store/Results.aspx/Networking/Security-Optimization/
12 matches
Mail list logo
