Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

2016-10-28 Thread James Bensley
On 24 October 2016 at 23:09, Maile Halatuituia wrote: > 4. The last bith is that from my scenario now the route injection only happen > if the Primary Link Router in down or link to it is down. However if the > internet link is down i have figure out a way to still

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

2016-10-24 Thread Maile Halatuituia
lt;jwbens...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:38 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE > From: Maile Halatuituia > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:35 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: VRF-Lite between PE > > &

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

2016-10-24 Thread James Bensley
> From: Maile Halatuituia > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:35 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: VRF-Lite between PE > > > Hi > > > I have this scenario. > > > CUSTOMER PE1 --- PE2 CUSTOMER > || > > >

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

2016-10-24 Thread Maile Halatuituia
?somebody ??? From: Maile Halatuituia Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:35 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: VRF-Lite between PE Hi I have this scenario. CUSTOMER PE1 --- PE2 CUSTOMER |

[c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

2016-10-19 Thread Maile Halatuituia
Hi I have this scenario. CUSTOMER PE1 --- PE2 CUSTOMER || || PrimarySecondary