Hi all
A recommendation on preferred method of achieving the following
scenario:
[AS Y BGP Router]---[AS Z transit router][AS Z BGP
router]
AS Y router config
Neighbor BGP-Z-loopback as Z
Neighbor BGP-Z-loopback ebgp-multihop 10
Ip route x.x.x.x.
Hi William,
you cant have a router in the middle with less routing information than the
routers at the edge because as you say it doesnt know where to send the traffic.
If you dont want/cant run BGP on the transit router then a viable alternative
would be to have the transit router have a
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Hi William, you cant have a router in the middle with less routing
information than the routers at the edge because as you say it doesnt
know where to send the traffic.
Sure you can.
MPLS.
Or, GRE tunnels (admittedly not pretty, quite the hack job at that).
pt
I agree with Stephen that you should try to avoid this router in the middle
(KISS). But if it really has to be there, is a GRE tunnel between AS-Y and
AS-Z-BGP-Router such an obscene idea?
Vincent
you cant have a router in the middle with less routing information than
the routers at the edge
