Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-30 Thread Nick Hilliard
Nick Cutting wrote: > The main SFlow collection point(s) are 36 port 100g nexus 9236c, so I > think it is based on different chipsets – ASE2 Right, I missed it was a different asic. You should reach out to your SE and ask her/him if there is any way of poking this in hardware, in the same way

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-29 Thread Nick Cutting
...@foobar.org] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:26 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump This message originated from outside your organization Nick Cutting wrote: > I didn’t seem to be able to use that command on a N

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Nick Hilliard
Nick Cutting wrote: > I didn’t seem to be able to use that command on a Nexus 9200 - the > guide for the shell seems for the 9500 and the 3k? N9K access instructions here: >

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Nick Cutting
- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:13 PM To: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump This message originated from outside your organization Nick Cutting wrote: > Doesn't look like sfl

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Nick Hilliard
Nick Cutting wrote: > Doesn't look like sflow daemon supports the -s sampling tag. > > %sources = ( > 'myRouter' => { 'port' => '9901', 'col' => '#00ff00', 'type' => > 'netflow', 'optarg' => ' -s -1000 '}, > ); yes, that's correct. The sflow sampling rate is specified in each sflow

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Nick Hilliard
Nick Cutting wrote: > sflow sampling-rate 4096 <-- this is 512? that means that out of every 4096 packets received on an interface, one will be punted to the sflow collector. You can check the hardware sampling rate using the PortSampRate command in the broadcom shell, like this: > n3k# test

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Nick Cutting
This was an example I took from the nfsen forums - it is a negative value. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin M. Streiner Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 3:32 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Justin M. Streiner
nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Sunday, August 6, 2017 1:46 AM To: 'Phil Mayers' <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump netflow -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-28 Thread Nick Cutting
mperial.ac.uk>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump netflow -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / n

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-17 Thread Ryan Gelobter
You may want to checkout ntopng/nprobe if you haven't already. Depending on the number of flows and features you need you may be able to use the community/trial versions. If not I think the price is very reasonable for what you get. (under $1k euro for both per year). I got tired of having to

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-05 Thread Aaron Gould
netflow -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:08 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump On 03/08/17 22:53, Aaron Gould wrote: > I do 1/512 sample rate on

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-04 Thread Phil Mayers
On 03/08/17 22:53, Aaron Gould wrote: I do 1/512 sample rate on my asr9k's and usually multiple numbers gathered in nfsen by 512 to normalize sflow? Or netflow? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-03 Thread Aaron Gould
We run Nfsen 1.3.6 - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 4:00 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump Slightly off topic, however related to the solarwinds

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-03 Thread Aaron Gould
utt...@edgetg.com> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump Nick, Nfsen/nfdump is pretty rock solid. I've been running it for many years without too many dramas. I use a combination of sflow / netflow within our network. The only issue I have is it seems to incorrectly show

Re: [c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-01 Thread Patrick Cole
Nick, Nfsen/nfdump is pretty rock solid. I've been running it for many years without too many dramas. I use a combination of sflow / netflow within our network. The only issue I have is it seems to incorrectly show packet rate for sflow but is fine with netflow (due to the 1 in 1024 sample

[c-nsp] nfSen / nfDump

2017-08-01 Thread Nick Cutting
Slightly off topic, however related to the solarwinds talks of last week. Just wondering what versions of nfSen and nfdump you fine people are running - and on what operating system, e.g debian / red hat etc. I understand Nfsen has not been updated since 2011 - is this a problem - or is it