On 30 January 2019 15:15:02 GMT, Aaron Gould wrote:
>I read that SR/SPRING is an alternative to LDP or RSVP... seems that
>SR/SPRING is a label distribution protocol. Meaning, in my mind, it's
>a way
>to learn labels...mpls labels I guess. If so, would we refer to EVPN
>as
>EVPN-SR? If so,
Ummm, that too. LOL
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
James Bensley
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:05 AM
To: Tom Ammon; Cisco-nsp List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] segment routing/evpn on ASR920
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 02:36
I read that SR/SPRING is an alternative to LDP or RSVP... seems that
SR/SPRING is a label distribution protocol. Meaning, in my mind, it's a way
to learn labels...mpls labels I guess. If so, would we refer to EVPN as
EVPN-SR? If so, would it follow that a non-sr network, one that has
employed
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 02:36, Tom Ammon wrote:
>
> Has anybody tried running segment routing on ASR920? If so, did you run in
> to any caveats? What about EVPN over segment routing on that platform? The
> SR configuration guide for this platform lists segment routing, but doesn't
> call out EVPN
Has anybody tried running segment routing on ASR920? If so, did you run in
to any caveats? What about EVPN over segment routing on that platform? The
SR configuration guide for this platform lists segment routing, but doesn't
call out EVPN specifically - it only lists VPLS and L2VPN.
Tom
--
