On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:10:35AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:33:55AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Router#sh run | i prox
ip arp proxy disable
Router#sh run int g0/1 | i prox
Router#sh
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:33:55AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Router#sh run | i prox
ip arp proxy disable
Router#sh run int g0/1 | i prox
Router#sh ip int g0/1 | i Prox
Proxy ARP is enabled
I've verified
Hello Daniel:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:11 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] unwanted arp reply traffic at IX
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:23
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:50:00PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Hooray for Cisco default features. This is one of the more stupid
ones, especially as it's enabled by default.
Have them configure no ip gratuitous-arps.
At least it's configurable on global level, unlike no ip proxy-arp
and no
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:50:00PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Hooray for Cisco default features. This is one of the more stupid
ones, especially as it's enabled by default.
Have them configure no ip gratuitous-arps.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
At least it's configurable on global level, unlike no ip proxy-arp
and no ip redirects (and others). :-(
Slightly correcting myself here:
there is ip arp proxy disable in some newer IOS trains which disables
proxy-arp globally, and
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:52:34PM +0100, Enno Rey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:50:00PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Have them configure no ip gratuitous-arps.
hmm... I've always been of the (possibly wrong) opinion that no
ip gratuitous-arps was only relevant in PPP scenarios and
From what I gather, the customers PPP sessions are landing on the same box
that connects to the IX.
Tom
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:50:00PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Hooray for Cisco default features. This is one of the
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:33:55AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Router#sh run | i prox
ip arp proxy disable
Router#sh run int g0/1 | i prox
Router#sh ip int g0/1 | i Prox
Proxy ARP is enabled
I've verified that proxy ARP is actually disabled. Just opened a
TAC case for that.
We have two participants at our IX who are spewing out broadcast ARP
reply packets onto the fabric.
In both cases, the participants are running Cisco routers that have
customer ATM based DSL circuits on other interfaces.
no ip mobile arp an no ip proxy-arp on the ATM or IX facing
interfaces
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:37:48PM +, Chris Caputo wrote:
In both cases, the participants are running Cisco routers that have
customer ATM based DSL circuits on other interfaces.
no ip mobile arp an no ip proxy-arp on the ATM or IX facing
interfaces have not stopped the apparent
11 matches
Mail list logo