Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping

2009-01-14 Thread Brad Henshaw
Jon Lewis wrote: I'm configuring my first 3560s... you can't police the output of a port you can't even define an output service-policy for a port. This is correct as far as I'm aware. It appears the 3560-way to do this is to use srr-queue bandwidth shape on the interface, but the syntax

Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping

2009-01-14 Thread Jon Lewis
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Brad Henshaw wrote: you can't police the output of a port you can't even define an output service-policy for a port. This is correct as far as I'm aware. This is awfully disappointing considering the 3560 is supposed to be the successor to the 3550. You can try the

Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping

2009-01-14 Thread Brad Henshaw
Jon Lewis wrote: That also won't work in this special case, as the rate-limiting/shaping is only to be done on a class of traffic, and only if that traffic has to egress through a particular port. Under normal conditions, the traffic won't need to be shaped. In that case I think you're

Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping

2009-01-14 Thread Yan Filyurin
: Brad Henshaw brad.hens...@qcn.com.au To: Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:12:31 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping Jon Lewis wrote: I'm configuring my first 3560s... you can't police the output of a port you can't even define

Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping

2009-01-14 Thread Yan Filyurin
...@lewis.org Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:57:32 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560 QoS/shaping Jon Lewis wrote: That also won't work in this special case, as the rate-limiting/shaping is only to be done on a class of traffic, and only if that traffic has