Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K - 6PE packets punted to RP

2017-07-12 Thread Aaron Gould
Thanks James...they mention it's the changing of the v6 next-hop from recursive to non-recursive or vice versa that causes an issue https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo20651 I see 6VPE is also mentioned as possibly affected. Seems like I'm not completely safe since I run 6VPE

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K - 6PE packets punted to RP

2017-07-12 Thread James Jun
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:54:08AM -0500, Aaron Gould wrote: > I've tested and running in some places dual-stacked over MPLS L3VPN > (6*V*PE)... I haven't seen any problems with 6VPE via my ASR9k's as of > yet... just thought I'd let you know in case you could go with 6VPE rather > than 6PE and

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K - 6PE packets punted to RP

2017-07-12 Thread Aaron Gould
I've tested and running in some places dual-stacked over MPLS L3VPN (6*V*PE)... I haven't seen any problems with 6VPE via my ASR9k's as of yet... just thought I'd let you know in case you could go with 6VPE rather than 6PE and avoid your issues. Just a thought. Sorry I don't have info about 6PE