I agree with Mark - why not do this on a server?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of james list
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2018 8:24 AM
To: c...@marenda.net
Cc: cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP server
This message originates from outside of your organisation.
Just one
Just one but hundreds of dhcp scopes.
Cheers
Il Sab 16 Giu 2018, 10:55 ha scritto:
> How many physical interfaces/ports?
>
> A c891f could be sufficient...
>
> Jürgen.
> -Original Message-
> Dear experts,
> a customer of mine as an old C7200 acting as DHCP server and wants to
> replace
How many physical interfaces/ports?
A c891f could be sufficient...
Jürgen.
-Original Message-
Dear experts,
a customer of mine as an old C7200 acting as DHCP server and wants to
replace it with an IOS device in order to port configuration 1:1.
He asked for a solution which is not so
Hey James,
ISR4k is IOS-XE.
I know Cisco has some plans for lighter version of XR, so I wouldn't
be surprised if next-gens of CPEs and small switches get XR makeover.
Personally, I'd just rather take working 'roll forward' and 'commit'
in IOS-XE. Right now, only reason we run any IOS-XE/IOS
Hi Nick
Yes I was thinking to cat9300
Good point ISR44x, is that IOS or IOS.XE?
Thanks
Cheers
Il Ven 15 Giu 2018, 22:13 Nick Cutting ha scritto:
> ISR-44k is much cheaper than ASR 1k for forwarding in hardware
>
> But DHCP server is all done on CPU - so you could get away with a much
>
On 15/Jun/18 22:13, Nick Cutting wrote:
> ISR-44k is much cheaper than ASR 1k for forwarding in hardware
>
> But DHCP server is all done on CPU - so you could get away with a much
> cheaper software router like a ISR43xx
> Do you mean the catylyst 9300 series?
Personally, I'd do DHCP on a
ISR-44k is much cheaper than ASR 1k for forwarding in hardware
But DHCP server is all done on CPU - so you could get away with a much cheaper
software router like a ISR43xx
Do you mean the catylyst 9300 series?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of james list
Sent: Friday,
Hi MK,
You configure that in the pool.
For example:
ip dhcp pool pc's
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.1
dns-server 1.2.3.4
Etc...
ip dhcp pool access-points
network 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.2.1
dns-server 1.2.3.4
Etc...
Inter
Thanks for the reply
From: aa...@westfield.ma.edu
To: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] DHCP Server
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:56:50 +
Hi MK,
You configure that in the pool.
For example:
ip dhcp pool pc's
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132
http://blog.palehorse.net/2009/08/24/using-windows-7-with-multiple-gateways-and-dhcp/
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Tom ww10w...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does anyone know when you would specify multiple default routers in a
dhcp pool? How would a client know
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t2/feature/guide/ftrbeo82.html
Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to setup linux dhcpd ISC server to act according to
certain circuit-id values in the Option 82, and I find the whole
configuration very poorly documented, and quite
Also
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t4/feature/guide/gdhcpopt.html
which I think is what you want.
Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to setup linux dhcpd ISC server to act according to
certain circuit-id values in the Option 82, and I find the whole
configuration
http://www.thtech.net/article/10 for ISC example
Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to setup linux dhcpd ISC server to act according to
certain circuit-id values in the Option 82, and I find the whole
configuration very poorly documented, and quite complex. This is quite
surprising
Hello.
Pavel Skovajsa wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to setup linux dhcpd ISC server to act according to
certain circuit-id values in the Option 82, and I find the whole
configuration very poorly documented, and quite complex. This is quite
surprising to me that for such a market pushy
On Mon Apr 27, 2009 at 02:08:59PM -0700, Charles Wyble wrote:
http://www.thtech.net/article/10 for ISC example
That appears to be the canonical example that's trotted out everytime
Option 82 is mentioned. Fine if all you want to do is log the Option 82
information, but less than useful if you
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 23:04 +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Mon Apr 27, 2009 at 02:08:59PM -0700, Charles Wyble wrote:
http://www.thtech.net/article/10 for ISC example
That appears to be the canonical example that's trotted out everytime
Option 82 is mentioned. Fine if all you want to do is
16 matches
Mail list logo
