Oh by the way does anybody know when the mLDP is going to be supported
on ME3600 please?
Which mLDP? Full NG-MVPN mLDP or normal MDT-based mLDP?
Yes I'm interested in the full blown NG-MVPN with x-PMSI MP2MP/P2MP MLDP
with BGP-AD, though right now I'd be thankful for any mLDP support, but
On Monday, July 08, 2013 09:49:50 AM Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Yes I'm interested in the full blown NG-MVPN with x-PMSI
MP2MP/P2MP MLDP with BGP-AD, though right now I'd be
thankful for any mLDP support, but for that I guess I'd
have to wait about a year or so. And I hope the -CX
platform is
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 04:54:32 PM Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
Oh by the way does anybody know when the mLDP is going to
be supported on ME3600 please?
Which mLDP? Full NG-MVPN mLDP or normal MDT-based mLDP?
Cisco like to go incremental, so chances are support will be
basic MDT mLDP first,
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 09:26:51 AM Mikael Abrahamsson
wrote:
How is multicast supposed to work without PIM?
What Gert was talking about was Internet multicast, ie
multicast between ISPs. Watching NASA multicast streams
for instance (I did this at my university in ~1995).
Very few
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 10:35:33 AM Mattias Gyllenvarg
wrote:
That is why I addressed Oliver directly. I had a
discussion with him at Cisco Live and this came up.
The idea is too use MPLS/BGP for transport/signaling. So,
no PIM on core/dist links. Only toward Customers and
Peers.
On Friday, March 01, 2013 08:23:04 PM Gert Doering wrote:
Our experience: it doesn't. We turned it off with our
upstreams a few years back, because every time someone
wanted to use it for real (every few months) we found
that some upstream changes had broken it again, like
turning up new
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 10:26:38 AM Mikael Abrahamsson
wrote:
How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3
routing without PIM?
C-multicast signaling would be handled by BGP, instead of
PIM. This is how (S,G) informations gets propagated in an
NG-MVPN network.
This ties
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:43:31 AM Christian Meutes
wrote:
You need mLDP or RSVP for that, Label-Switched-Multicast.
Cisco currently goes the mLDP course, while others go
NG-Multicast.
Cisco's mLDP now supports BGP C-multicast, although p2mp
RSVP-TE was not yet in there last time I
Sorry for the weak context.
I was just refering too removing PIM from within Core/Dist not inter-AS.
On 6 March 2013 08:26, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
About that, Oliver, is multicast-BGP production ready in IOS ans IOS XR.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
I was just refering too removing PIM from within Core/Dist not inter-AS.
How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing without
PIM?
I'll admit I'm a bit rusty and only know about PIM-SM and PIM-SSM, what
other methods are
That is why I addressed Oliver directly. I had a discussion with him at
Cisco Live and this came up.
The idea is too use MPLS/BGP for transport/signaling. So, no PIM on
core/dist links. Only toward Customers and Peers.
I do'nt have the details as we have not yet looked into implementing but,
as
On 06.03.2013, at 09:26, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:.
How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing without PIM?
I'll admit I'm a bit rusty and only know about PIM-SM and PIM-SSM, what other
methods are there for controlling routed multicast?
You need
That's it, seems too have alot of caveats on the ME3600X though.
On 6 March 2013 10:43, Christian Meutes christ...@errxtx.net wrote:
On 06.03.2013, at 09:26, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:.
How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing
without PIM?
I'll
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR and router rib rump always-replicate
On 06.03.2013, at 09:26, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:.
How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing without
PIM?
I'll admit I'm a bit rusty and only know about PIM-SM and PIM-SSM, what
other
About that, Oliver, is multicast-BGP production ready in IOS ans IOS XR.
Specifically ASR9k, 7606 Sup720, ME3600X and 3560/3750?
Whould be nice too remove PIM from the core, just as Gert says limited use
= limited support.
On 1 March 2013 19:23, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
About that, Oliver, is multicast-BGP production ready in IOS ans IOS XR.
Specifically ASR9k, 7606 Sup720, ME3600X and 3560/3750?
People have been running multicast on XR (ASR9K) and 7600 since forever.
I'd be more worried about ME3600X and
On 01.03.2013, at 07:44, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
Proper way (at least it was in XR 3.6 - 3.8 time) is to put multicast sources
into BGP address-family multicast. By default, if the source is only in BGP
af-unicast then it's not considered valid for multicast RPF check in
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote:
On 01.03.2013, at 07:44, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
Proper way (at least it was in XR 3.6 - 3.8 time) is to put multicast sources
into BGP address-family multicast. By default, if the source is only in BGP
af-unicast then it's not
On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes
Do you have your sources addresses in IGP?
Nope, BGP SAFI unicast.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote:
On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes
Do you have your sources addresses in IGP?
Nope, BGP SAFI unicast.
Well, your experience contradicts mine. I have had to solve issues with
I have had to solve issues with multicast not working and started working
when the sources were put in SAFI multicast with as late software as XR
4.2.1.
Haven't you been using MSDP or inter-as multicast in your setup please?
adam
___
cisco-nsp
On 01/03/2013 10:58, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote:
On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes
Do you have your sources addresses in IGP?
Nope, BGP SAFI unicast.
Well,
On 01.03.2013, at 13:06, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com wrote:
On 01/03/2013 10:58, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian Meutes wrote:
On 01.03.2013, at 10:01, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
I have had to solve issues with multicast not working and started
working when the sources were put in SAFI multicast with as late
software as XR 4.2.1.
Haven't you been using MSDP or inter-as multicast in your setup please?
I don't know what
Thanks, Oliver! That explains exactly what we were seeing. We doing have a
multicast AF enabled in our IGP on the affected routers, so now I
understand why we needed the additional replication commands.
Thanks again,
John
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 02:56:07PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I haven't tried to get Internet multicast working for a few years,
basically because nobody used it. We had it working via transit and a few
peers a few years back, I have no idea if it works now or not.
Our experience:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, John Neiberger wrote:
Entries for prefixes that are in the access list look like you would
expect and those PIM joins succeed. So what exactly does rump
always-replicate do? Am I right that it's basically only allowing the
prefixes in the ACL to be used for multicast RPF?
27 matches
Mail list logo
