Re: [c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 09:18:43 AM Catalin Petrescu wrote: Another test we did is to have the xr as a receiver , the p2mp tunnel is building , but as you said no LSP-VIF interface , thus the rpf check will fail. I never got it to work as advertised and ended up using mldp. I know Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

2014-07-02 Thread Cydon Satyr
Thanks. Yeah mLDP is nicer for mvpn. We're playing/experimenting with P2MP tunnels for IPTV and with FRR protection. So, what I'm trying to do is map global multicast traffic to P2MP, not vrf traffic. I'm not seeing anything going trough. I wanted to check if anyone has configured this before

Re: [c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

2014-07-02 Thread Catalin Petrescu
Hi, I think you are referring to this test http://www.eantc.de/fileadmin/eantc/downloads/events/2011-2015/MPLSEWC2013/EANTC-MPLSEWC2013-WhitePaper-5.1.pdf , page 12 goes into detail about the issues and fixes. For 1st problem this is fixed on jnp with mvpn-iana-rt-import. Need to load up the lab

Re: [c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:42:29 AM Cydon Satyr wrote: Yeah mLDP is nicer for mvpn. We're playing/experimenting with P2MP tunnels for IPTV and with FRR protection. I originally used p2mp RSVP-TE for IPTv, but I'm also comfortable using mLDP for IPTv as well. There is work ongoing to add

Re: [c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:47:14 AM Catalin Petrescu wrote: I think you are referring to this test http://www.eantc.de/fileadmin/eantc/downloads/events/2011 -2015/MPLSEWC2013/EANTC-MPLSEWC2013-WhitePaper-5.1.pdf , No, not that test. The test I'm talking about is in a live operator. But