Re: [c-nsp] 6509 / 3750 link problem

2007-04-09 Thread Phil Mayers
Glenn Tan wrote: Hi I am having a strange problem here... We're trying to connect to an uplink's Catalyst 3750 from one of our 6509 SUP720s via 1000base-LX over single-mode fiber and we are having this weird problem where our router shows the interface as down/down, whereas their router

[c-nsp] DWDM SFP support

2007-04-09 Thread Church, Charles
Anyone, Looking over: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps5455/products_device_su pport_table09186a0080385874.html#wp67207 I see that a few platforms (6500 and it's ME variants) support the DWDM SFP, but I'm not seeing it on the smaller switches or routers. The 6500s all

[c-nsp] 5500 rxpause counters

2007-04-09 Thread Jeff Crowe
Hi all, I have a 5500 switch that occasionally throws the following error: %SYS-4-PORT_WARN:Port 8/10 dmaTxFull (14049706) dmaRetry (0) dmaLevel2Request (0) Cisco tells me that is is most likely a duplex mis-match and to set the port maunally. The port is already hard coded for 100/full. I am

[c-nsp] Cisco 2800 - WIC T1-DSU V2

2007-04-09 Thread Nathan Buck
Recently we have had issues surfing the internet and to rule out the 2801 we decided to replace the 2801 with our spare 2801 and spare WIC. The only difference is the IOS version is newer. The old and new WIC cards have been tested in other routers and other locations and work perfectly fine. I

[c-nsp] Platforms supporting FRF.16

2007-04-09 Thread ARGCRP-LYNCH, TOMAS
Cisco NSPs, I was searching for the router models that support FRF16 and what I got at this point is 2500 (?), 2600, 3600, 7200, 7500 and 12000. Do you know any other model supporting this feature or shall I assume that after 12.4 all the routers support it? Regards, Tomas

[c-nsp] patch panels/cable management..

2007-04-09 Thread Peter Kranz
Looking for 'best practices' and recommendations for carrier rack cable management.. I am mounting 2 6506-E's with fiber and copper linecards (primary /redundant router) in the meet me room of a new data center, and want to end up with a slick looking install vs the crazy cable tangle some of

Re: [c-nsp] patch panels/cable management..

2007-04-09 Thread David Prall
Peter, Something like the RCI http://www.carlyle-inc.com/industry/network.htm David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 1:26 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720 LAN module support?

2007-04-09 Thread Phil Bedard
I've been told that supported list for 12.2SR isn't correctly updated. The RSP720 datasheet is a better source for supported modules at this point. Phil On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: I was wondering if anyone had a list of LAN modules supported by the

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720 LAN module support?

2007-04-09 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
I was wondering if anyone had a list of LAN modules supported by the RSP720/SRB? The 'Guide to Supported Hardware for Cisco 7600 Series Routers with Cisco IOS Release 12.2SR' (http://tinyurl.com/qvk8s) is supposed to be the authorative source. However, the guide doesn't seem to be fully

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 / 3750 link problem

2007-04-09 Thread Dale Shaw
Glenn, On 4/9/07, Glenn Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I am having a strange problem here... We're trying to connect to an uplink's Catalyst 3750 from one of our 6509 SUP720s via 1000base-LX over single-mode fiber and we are having this weird problem where our router shows the interface as

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 / 3750 link problem

2007-04-09 Thread Brad Henshaw
Glenn, In addition to the other suggestions, I noticed the following in your output: Your side: Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is LH Their side: Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is force-up, media type is 1000BaseLX SFP It's possible they've set 'speed nonegotiate' on their gig port. If so,

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 / 3750 link problem

2007-04-09 Thread Nick Griffin
In the past I've had to do speed nonegotiate give that a shot. On 4/9/07, Brad Henshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glenn, In addition to the other suggestions, I noticed the following in your output: Your side: Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is LH Their side: Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s,