[c-nsp] Interface flaps affecting BGP and IS-IS

Hi, We have a an edge router which connects to our upstream transit provider over a 10Gbps interface. Recently, on a couple of occasions, this interface has flapped resulting in BGP processes consuming ~100% CPU (we are receiving a full table over this peering). Consequently, when the CPU is

Re: [c-nsp] Interface flaps affecting BGP and IS-IS

Increasing SPD or hold-queue might help http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00809d16f0.shtml#interfacein Jon -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] På vegne av Per Carlson Sendt: 19.

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

Another option is to have a loopback address on the far end device with a static route on the near end device pointing at the exit interface (not the next-hop IP). That way you can telnet to the loopback address and overwrite the interface address without breaking your telnet session. Reload

Re: [c-nsp] Renumbering serial interfaces

Isn't configuration rollback supposed to bypass the reload in 5 issue? -- Tassos Gert Doering wrote on 17/02/2010 22:30: Always remember to put in reload in 5 before you do anything that might lock you out, and reload cancel afterwards... gert

[c-nsp] ASR 1002-F

Does the ASR 1002-F support L2TPv3? I can't find it any where in the feature navigator. Anyone has experience with this? Regards, Rens ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] Inter-VRF OSPF Redistribution

Hi, Does anyone know whether it is possible to redistribute routes between two different OSPF processes when they are associated with different VRFs? I have the following setup on some routers running 12.4(15)T: +-+ [VRF] ++ | CPE +-[0/0][0/0]-+ S1 |

Re: [c-nsp] EOMPLS between 10G subinterface and GE subinterface between two 7600

Hello, I do not have x-connect interface attached as I can see: #show MPLS platform EoMPLS | include 7/3 # If I create an EOMPLS on a 6500 with 10G interface connected to the same Juniper it works ,i can ping between CE1 and CE2 so the problem seemd to be on the 7600. Thank you, John On

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-VRF OSPF Redistribution

Chris, Does anyone know whether it is possible to redistribute routes between two different OSPF processes when they are associated with different VRFs? you need to use BGP and route-target import/export to exchange routes between the VRFs (even with vrf-lite). for example to import green

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-VRF OSPF Redistribution

Hi Oli, Chris, Does anyone know whether it is possible to redistribute routes between two different OSPF processes when they are associated with different VRFs? you need to use BGP and route-target import/export to exchange routes between the VRFs (even with vrf-lite). for example to import

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-VRF OSPF Redistribution

Chris, you need to use BGP and route-target import/export to exchange routes between the VRFs (even with vrf-lite). for example to import green routes into red: That works fine if both interfaces are within VRFs, but one interface is within a VRF and another is within the global table.

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-VRF OSPF Redistribution

Oli, sorry, missed this one. Unfortunately, this is not possible :-( You could move all global interfaces into vrf global, but need to make sure all services you use in global are vrf-aware in your version.. That is the current solution that I am testing, which seems to work, but makes it

[c-nsp] Roadmap questions reqarding various IPv6 features

Hello, as our SE has been unable to answer our questions regarding the IPv6 roadmap for 2960 and 3560 switches, maybe someone on this list can help out. The setup: Student Dormitory Network - one IPv4 Address per appartment - appartment==IPv4==Port Quota via Netflow(v9) from central device

[c-nsp] availability

Does anyone have information concerning calculating network availability based on a network design? For example, is redundant P and PE routers more available statistically than single P and PEs with redundant route processors, etc .? I am looking to input network design parameters and

Re: [c-nsp] 6509-e IOS update

The config-register defines how the boot process will occur. Usually we have the default values of 0x2102 or 0x102 meaning that the router/switch will take a look to the config and there usually we have a boot system flash device:filename command. So in your case i would do something like: no

Re: [c-nsp] 6509-e IOS update

Many thanks.. -Original Message- From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt] Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 9:04 AM To: Leslie Meade; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6509-e IOS update The config-register defines how the boot process will occur. Usually we have the

Re: [c-nsp] [cisco-voip] FW: Getting Unity to work when in SRST mode.

The only thing I can offer to this is good luck getting RDNIS to work. I can't recall once where I've seen RDNIS make it all the way through the PSTN cloud to the site hosting Unity. Matthew Saskin msas...@gmail.com 203-253-9571 July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run

Re: [c-nsp] 6509-e IOS update

FYI Based on the dates on your flash, are you thinking of moving to this image: 1 60284964 Feb 19 2010 15:42:58 s3223-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH6.bin I would think you should be on this image instead: S3223-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI3.bin I believe most have skipped the SXH

[c-nsp] 6816 vs 6724

Is there any compelling reason to use a 6724 linecard over a 6816 (_not_ a 6516, thank you very much), assuming you only need 6-10 gig fiber ports? Assume this is for a 6500/sup720-2B, with DFCs thrown on, mix of multicast and unicast, bursty loads. I've been using 6816s and the only real

[c-nsp] VPN Client 64-bit support for Windows 7 / Windows Vista: 5.0.7 beta

Hi all, If you remember the threads about the 64-bit support on the IPSEC VPN client for Windows: thank you for the feedback. Adding to that: $me mode=messenger In addition to serving as a general maintenance release, the Cisco VPN Client 5.0.7 beta is compatible with Windows 7 Windows

Re: [c-nsp] Load-sharing with two links to the same ISP

On looking at this again, it appears that BGP Multipath only works when the eBGP sessions are terminated on the same box. The scenario here is two eBGP session to the same ISP, but terminating on two different customer edge routers (with an iBGP session between them). In the lab tests I've done,

[c-nsp] Cisco ONS 15454 for dummies

I'm getting ready to do some facilities expansion to a building about 300 cable-feet away. I currently have Ethernet, OC-N, and DS-N services, clear-channel and channelized that can land on access equipment or handed off as Out-of-Band connections to customers. We have multiple ILECs and CLECs

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ONS 15454 for dummies

The ONS is really just a SONET/SDH ADM... MSTP is the DWDM platform using muxponders/transponders/amps/etc powered and controlled by the chassis. What your after is the 454 MSPP, which is basically a modular ADM that can do ethernet over SONET and tdm etc... Depending on the scale of your VT1.5

Re: [c-nsp] Load-sharing with two links to the same ISP

Matthew Melbourne wrote: On looking at this again, it appears that BGP Multipath only works when the eBGP sessions are terminated on the same box. The scenario here is two eBGP session to the same ISP, but terminating on two different customer edge routers (with an iBGP session between them).