[c-nsp] BGP query

Dear experts I've a BGP question. I've a router peering with a customer of mine, plain EBGP no MPLS, see following chain as example: myroutera --ebgp-- myrouterB --ebgp-- myrouterC --ebgp-- mycustomerA --ebgp-- mycustomer_BGP_worldwide_network Between myrouterX I use EBGP with private AS, now

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:55:51PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > I would suggest you talk to some other vendor as well, specifically a vendor > how cares about passive solutions. > > I may be wrong, but my impression is that Cisco is EOL'ing the entire > *passive* CWDM and DWDM gear. Whens

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3850 10G version experiences

I am also very interested in these switches - Any feedback is monstrously welcome -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Antoine Monnier Sent: 10 March 2016 09:08 To: Robert Hass Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001, 4.3.4sp6, MAC-Accounting ignoring certain peers?

Hi, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:26:35PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > Someone mentioned a few months ago that there supposedly is a limit of > 512 peer MAC addresses - but the list of addresses that the box *is* > counting traffic for is around 400 right now, which is not your typical > "magic

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3850 10G version experiences

Hi Rob, did you receive any feedback? We are planning to deploy our first pair of 3850-XS unit in a few months. Those are only supported from IOS-XE 3.7 train. Let's hope software quality is ok... Cheers On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Robert Hass wrote: > Hi > I'm building

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3850 10G version experiences

We have been using some WS-C3850-12XS as L2 aggregation (03.07.02E, no fancy features) for a few months without any apparent issues. Of course stacking is out of question in our network. -- Tassos Nick Cutting wrote on 10/3/2016 12:04 μμ: > I am also very interested in these switches - Any

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

> I can't speak to the roadmap or plans for that product, but the only > thing that is currently announced for EOL is the EWDM-OA amplifier. > There is no announced EOL for the 2/4/8 port units. I must have mixed that up with some other, unrelated EOL, sorry about that. But do talk to a vendor

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

On 09/03/16 22:37, Jared Mauch wrote: If you are only doing 10g there are a lot of inexpensive solutions in this space for the distances you mentioned. Agreed. Cisco are not the vendor that would spring to mind for this. Lots of good, reliable, cheap passive DWDM muxes out there.

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3850 10G version experiences

I have deployed Catalyst 3850s stacked 2-4 high as core/aggregation switches. No problems. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:05 AM To: Antoine Monnier; Robert Hass Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] DWDM Passive or Active Multiplexing

Thank you everyone for all the great information. Much appreciated!! I am having meeting with a couple other vendors onsite next-week and will review their solutions as well as the cost. Josh On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 09/03/16 22:37,

Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3850 10G version experiences

I believe the 48 port 10G model with the 40 gig fixed uplinks is not stackable It has a 640 gig backplane. -Original Message- From: Carter, Bill [mailto:wcar...@sentinel.com] Sent: 10 March 2016 14:28 To: Nick Cutting; Antoine Monnier; Robert Hass Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP query

neighbor (ip) allowas-in but be careful of routing loops On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:38 PM, james list wrote: > Dear experts > I've a BGP question. I've a router peering with a customer of mine, plain > EBGP no MPLS, see following chain as example: > > myroutera --ebgp--