Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

I just had a presentation on this. Sounded like the ASR920 AKA Rebranded as the NCS4200 will be running the NCS Code. Sounded like same hardware. Also thinking it's more of a product switch to fill out the NCS Product set. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

> On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Now the interesting question is, of course, *which* NCS code... as there > seem to be a number of different "NCS*" families. > > An ASR920-style device with IOS XR on it, and actually doing all the > nice XR things,

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Asr920 hw with ios-xr would be interesting depending on price. //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] För Erik Sundberg Skickat: den 25 april 2017 20:22 Till: Pete Templin ; Gert Doering

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:21:51PM +, Erik Sundberg wrote: > I just had a presentation on this. > > Sounded like the ASR920 AKA Rebranded as the NCS4200 will be running the NCS > Code. Sounded like same hardware. > > Also thinking it's more of a product switch to fill out the NCS

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Perhaps similar to what juniper does with the following... juniper acx5048 https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information -products/pathway-pages/acx-series/acx5000/ juniper qfx5100 https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/information

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Maybe it's to generate more sales... Like the reese's peanut butter cup was good, but wait til you try the reese's peanut butter egg. ... LOL -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

NCS code ? Going off what I know of the NCS5x00 it runs IOS XR 6.x So I guess that would be different from the 920 since I recall it ran XE -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

The ASR900 series will not be replaced by NCS4200, both series will co-exist. Best Regards Ted -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent: den 25 april 2017 06:05 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] NCS4200 -

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Perhaps it will take the place of the ME3800X? tis 25 apr. 2017 kl 08:08 skrev Ted Johansson : > The ASR900 series will not be replaced by NCS4200, both series will > co-exist. > > Best Regards > Ted > > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

seems like it is just re-branding and positioning it as NCS Transport box instead of ASR IP box. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > Perhaps it will take the place of the ME3800X? > > tis 25 apr. 2017 kl 08:08 skrev Ted Johansson

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:07:11AM +, Ted Johansson wrote: > The ASR900 series will not be replaced by NCS4200, both series will co-exist. Sounds like the BUs suddenly remembered how much the customers appreciated the 6500/7600 split, and wanted to re-enact that great success again.

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Why? Why have an exact copy of the ASR92x/ASR90xI fail to see the logic, other than they are using a new chipset in the NCS42x that is not compatible with the architecture of the ASR9x? If feature parity between the 2 are identicalIt makes no sense? Thanks

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:06:33AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: > If feature parity between the 2 are identicalIt makes no sense? Look at the history of the 6500/7600 split... Starting out with identical hardware, just differently coloured, sold by different BUs. Then start

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Haha Gert your comments are the best. Probably so that a sales guy in a room crafting an expensive solution can use the NCS branding for more of the design he/she is proposing. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] NCS4200 - re-badged ASR920 / ASR900 ?

Or the Nexus 5010 vs. UCS Fabric Interconnect debacle? I think there's one extra CPU/ASIC on the board of the FIs, and the paint color is different, but the code is different. On 4/25/17 4:24 AM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:06:33AM +, CiscoNSP List wrote: If