Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router?

2019-10-29 Thread adamv0025
> From: Saku Ytti > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 11:41 AM > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 13:24, wrote: > > > Sure there's a BW rate above which NPU clearly wins, But for low BW > > cases like the on in OP's case it's a no brainer even with massive server > (total overkill for 10G) the 10G

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router?

2019-10-29 Thread adamv0025
> Saku Ytti > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 3:38 PM > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:55, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hey, > > > But this should not be an excuse for a vendor not publishing basic > > things like "the forwarding hardware on can > > handle 4.13 trillion IPv4 entries, unless you use

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router?

2019-10-29 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi! > Am 29.10.2019 um 10:25 schrieb > : > Since you don't need throughput maybe vMX/cRDP or vXR 9000 with just couple > of gig of licenses would be an option? > That way you'll get all the internet proven BGP stack offered by the big > boxes for fraction of the price tailored to your BW

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router?

2019-10-29 Thread Saku Ytti
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 13:24, wrote: > Sure there's a BW rate above which NPU clearly wins, > But for low BW cases like the on in OP's case it's a no brainer even with > massive server (total overkill for 10G) the 10G virtual is 8 times cheaper > than the cheapest HW option. > I'm being vague

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router?

2019-10-29 Thread Saku Ytti
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 11:25, wrote: > To the OP's question, > Since you don't need throughput maybe vMX/cRDP or vXR 9000 with just couple > of gig of licenses would be an option? > That way you'll get all the internet proven BGP stack offered by the big > boxes for fraction of the price

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 4000 series (4461) as a BGP router?

2019-10-29 Thread adamv0025
> From: Saku Ytti > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 10:07 AM > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 11:25, wrote: > > > To the OP's question, > > Since you don't need throughput maybe vMX/cRDP or vXR 9000 with just > > couple of gig of licenses would be an option? > > That way you'll get all the internet

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

2019-10-29 Thread Aaron Gould
You just gave me another reason to like Juniper :| -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

2019-10-29 Thread Aaron Gould
Btw, good job, and thanks Jürgen for the informative and detailed instruction on XR upgrade. -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 10:23 AM To: c...@marenda.net;