c...@marenda.net wrote on 04/05/2020 10:11:
So we will soon see MPLS over HTTPS with fancy XML-Schemes-
Network-devices will be CHROMOS-Browser-Devices,
Don't think of performance or saleable implementation in hardware,
When that would be ready, the standard has been obsoleted and replaced by
On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 12:15, wrote:
> Just my 0.01$
Can I get a refund?
--
++ytti
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:36:09AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Of course, all going over BGP :-).
This is *not* funny.
The work that IETF/IDR is doing these days is truly and deeply scaring
me. "Hey, we have this nice reliable protocol to transport information
from here to there. Why not
> On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 12:15, wrote:
>
> > Just my 0.01$
>
> Can I get a refund?
just come and collect a ningi in my shed on Kakafroon Kappa,
but beware the vogon's.
Yes, you'll get a free Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster.
Juergen.
___
cisco-nsp
> Gert Doering
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 11:22 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:36:09AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > Of course, all going over BGP :-).
>
> This is *not* funny.
>
> The work that IETF/IDR is doing these days is truly and deeply scaring me.
> "Hey, we have this
On 4/May/20 11:11, c...@marenda.net wrote:
> Today everything must go over https (like dns, ...) but do not forget
> to use XML to over bloat everything and use at least TLS Rev. 9.11 .
> Will be punted into the dollar-note big cards (Hollerith) (80 Characters
> wide) Fragmentation will be
On 4/May/20 11:11, c...@marenda.net wrote:
> Today everything must go over https (like dns, ...)
> but do not forget to use XML to over bloat everything
> and use at least TLS Rev. 9.11 .
>
> Will be punted into the dollar-note big cards (Hollerith) (80 Characters
> wide)
> Fragmentation
On 4/May/20 11:17, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
>
> as long as you can encapsulate all that mess in json, I'm good.
Well, I'll leave that up to my SDN to wrap into my Segment Routing and
move it into my SD-WAN over my 5G :-).
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
>[...]
> DC-folks# This STP sucks, let's MC-LAG/VSS everything, ok that sucks let's
do
> TRILL et, al., that sucked let's do VXLAN, wait, how do we do CP-based mac
> learning? Let's do EVPN VXLAN, Oh has anyone reserved VXLAN header field
> that can be used for micro-segmentation?
On 4/May/20 11:23, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Can I get a refund?
Can I mail it to your WFH :-)?
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On 4/May/20 12:21, Gert Doering wrote:
> This is *not* funny.
>
> The work that IETF/IDR is doing these days is truly and deeply scaring
> me. "Hey, we have this nice reliable protocol to transport information
> from here to there. Why not add tons of different other things we want
> to be
> From: Nick Hilliard
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:14 PM
>
> adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote on 30/04/2020 13:14:
> > Never understood this VXLAN nonsense in DC universe (not the comics),
> > in SP space this was a solved problem and is a well-trodden path since
> > ever -PWs,
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
