Prit,
it's a pretty old feature, and should also work on all platforms running
12.2 or later. Can't comment on the other vendors' support for similar
functionality.
oli
From: Prit Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 7:25 AM
To:
Hello everybody,
Regarding this old thread, I've recently discovered that DOM is no
longer supported for XENPAK-10GB-LR with 12.2(33)SRB. And I'm not
speaking about SNMP. Not even CLI show of transceiver DOM.
Fortunately, transceiver DOM is still available for XENPAK-10GB-LW:
router#sh ver | i
Hi,
While configuring IBGP, I am getting Active stste in sh ip bgp summary.
debug of BGP is pested below.
R7-PE5#debug bgp ipv4 unicast
BGP debugging is on for address family: IPv4 Unicast
R7-PE5#clear ip bgp *
R7-PE5#
*Jul 18 09:09:00.476: BGPNSF state: 192.168.2.254 went from nsf_not_active
to
At 02:49 PM 18-07-07 +0530, Vikas Sharma wrote:
See:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/bgp_trouble_main.html#bgp_trouble_neighbor
-Hank
Hi,
While configuring IBGP, I am getting Active stste in sh ip bgp summary.
debug of BGP is pested below.
R7-PE5#debug bgp ipv4 unicast
BGP debugging is
Hi All,
Ive been happily running 12.0S on the 12k boxes with Eng3 linecard for a
while with no major issues.
Looks like for some Eng5 SIP/SPA combos, 12.0SY is required.
Anyone has been running 12.0SY in production ?
Any horror stories to tell, or can it be considered stable like 12.0S
Can anyone tell me where the temp sensors on a WS-X6148-GE-TX board are
physically located ?
This is part of the env info :
module 2 outlet temperature: 27C
module 2 inlet temperature: 24C
module 2 device-1 temperature: 25C
module 2 device-2 temperature: 27C
module 3 outlet
Mark Pace Balzan wrote on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:53 PM:
Hi All,
Ive been happily running 12.0S on the 12k boxes with Eng3 linecard
for a while with no major issues.
Looks like for some Eng5 SIP/SPA combos, 12.0SY is required.
Anyone has been running 12.0SY in production ?
Hi Mike,
On 7/17/07, Michael Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Daubman wrote:
Greetings,
I just received this error for the first time and was looking for
pointers as to how best re-carve TCAM.
What kind of sup do you have. Different sups have different memory. For
6509's anything
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:53:21 -0500, Jerry Kemp wrote
Can the ASA 5505 be configured as a VPN client to a 3030 concentrator?
A Google search turns up a few links (to include one at
forums.cisco.com) that suggest that this is possible, but nothing
definitive.
Thanks for any replies.
If
I can't speak to DOM support specifically. However have you tried SRB1?
Lots of bug fixes there. Personally I recommend sticking to the
bleeding edge of SR for a while until more of the bugs are worked out.
SRA3 to SRB was a huge step as far as features go.
In the event that this DOM
My goal to get started was 10 people. I'm at 7.
I wanted to get the process started as soon as possible.
3 more...any takers?
Rodney
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 02:12:25PM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
In working with the IOS Release Operations team I think I've convinced
them to try something a
The troubleshooting on the 3000 concentrators is pretty lacking for
displaying routing information. I have a client running OSPF for
dynamic routing and I would like to know where the device is learning
these routes.
Thanks for any comments,
Chris Serafin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Denial of Service Vulnerability in Cisco Wide
Area Application Services (WAAS) Software
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20070718-waas
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070718-waas.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:02:01AM +0300, Emanuel Popa wrote:
Hello everybody,
Regarding this old thread, I've recently discovered that DOM is no
longer supported for XENPAK-10GB-LR with 12.2(33)SRB. And I'm not
speaking about SNMP. Not even CLI show of transceiver DOM.
Fortunately,
If you are trying to reserve bandwidth or do prioritization, wouldn't you
want to use an output policy vs. input?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ahmad Cheikh Moussa
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:13 AM
To: David Granzer
Cc:
I have a network with a 3550 switch behind a PIX. The PIX is acting as
the DHCP server on its inside interface. We had an incident with a
rogue DHCP server on the LAN.
Turning on DHCP snooping on the switch causes the PIX to stop handing
out leases. I'm new to DHCP snooping configs, this is
Hi,
I've been out of the industry for a little while. Before I left, I remember
that Whitney was definitely going to be a long life build
for the 65, but was only Modular. Did a monolithic long life candidate
emerge? I'm still seeing SXF incrementing. What's the current
feeling on what to use and
The caveat with DHCP snooping is that you must establish a trust
relationship with downstream DHCP snoopers on a trunk port:
Switch(config-if)# ip dhcp relay information trusted
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
Nexlinx
http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jay Hennigan
Skickat: den 18 juli 2007 21:45
Till: Masood Ahmad Shah
Kopia: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP snooping with PIX 7.22 as dhcp server fails
Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
The caveat
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Jay Hennigan
Skickat: den 18 juli 2007 20:24
Till: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Ämne: [c-nsp] DHCP snooping with PIX 7.22 as dhcp server fails
I have a network with a 3550 switch behind a PIX. The PIX is
Daniel Dib wrote:
You are inserting option 82 in the DHCP request.
Maybe the PIX doesn't understand this format and that's why it's not working
with snooping?
Try no ip dhcp snooping information option in global config mode.
Indeed that fixed it! Thanks for your help.
--
Jay Hennigan -
Dear All,
We monitoring our vpdn session and see that the session drop suddenly. from the
debug we see that the tunnel finally shutdown.
any idea on how to troubleshoot this?
regards
Egn
Jul 17 15:38:25 : Tnl 27485 L2TP: O Resend CDN, flg TLS, ver 2, len 88, tnl
83, ns 17048, nr 42056
Jul 17
22 matches
Mail list logo
