Asbjorn,
From what I know it is planned for the next SR release (SRC).
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asbjorn Hojmark
- Lists
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 23:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
Can someone please clarify the following ?
Do these cards work together?
Supported only with SUP720
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/prod_installation_guide09186a008069bb90.html#wp1304068
Not listed under unsupported for RSP720
That's great news, thanks.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:46 AM
To: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] IOS SLB support
Asbjorn,
From what I
Until recently the 65xx and 76xx were the same car, just a different
paint job. Now the BUs are differentiating the boxes.
65xx will be running the 12.2SX train. This is aimed more at the
enterprise/DC space. If you want modular IOS, and MPLS features
targeted more towards the Enterprise, this
On Oct 17, 2007, at 9:00 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
1) From a speed/functionality standpoint would a 7600 or a
6500 be better in the Router/Switch (distribution) scenario?
This decision should be based upon software feature and linecard/
interface requirements.
2) For our IGP
We're going to be transitioning our networking from a simple 2
stage network:
Internet - router - switch - people
To a more traditional style 3 stage network to allow more
advanced services to happen between the edge and the aggregation layer:
Internet - Router
We're running that combination just fine here. Code revision:
IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-JK9S-M), Version 12.2(18)SXD,
RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
System image file is sup-bootflash:s72033-jk9s-mz.122-18.SXD.bin
Mod Ports Card Type Model
Serial No.
--- -
hey,
Do these cards work together?
RSP720 + WS-X6704-10GE works fine
--
tarko
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Matlock, Kenneth L 10/17/07 4:20 PM wrote:
We're running that combination just fine here. Code revision:
snip
14 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE
24 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE
34 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet
What's planned for in SRC, IOS SLB, or CSM/ACE support? Or both?
~Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
(avayner)
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:46 AM
To: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
SRB2 came out a handful of days ago. Anyone care to comment on
stability and bugs fixed or created? I see that Saku is running it on
his RSPs. Anyone else? We're still running Sup720-3BXLs here. I'm
reading through the release notes now but I'm wondering about actual
deployments with the
The closest thing I could find was CISCO-ENTITY-DIAG-MIB,
1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.350, but There is no supporting images
available for CISCO-ENTITY-DIAG-MIB according to CCO.
Its there in 12.2SXH:
CISCO-ENTITY-DIAG-MIB::ceDiagHMTestEnabled.1000.1 = INTEGER: false(2)
On (2007-10-17 11:19 -0500), Justin Shore wrote:
SRB2 came out a handful of days ago. Anyone care to comment on
stability and bugs fixed or created? I see that Saku is running it on
his RSPs. Anyone else? We're still running Sup720-3BXLs here. I'm
reading through the release notes now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Firewall Services
Module
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20071017-fwsm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20071017-fwsm.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2007 October 17 1600 UTC (GMT
SRB2 came out a handful of days ago. Anyone care to comment on
stability and bugs fixed or created? I see that Saku is running it on
his RSPs. Anyone else? We're still running Sup720-3BXLs here. I'm
reading through the release notes now but I'm wondering about actual
deployments with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Denial
of Service Vulnerabilities
Document ID: 98833
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20071017-cucm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20071017-cucm.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public
The 6500 is generally recommended for Converged Enterprise LAN/WAN, while the
7600 is geared more towards Service Provider environments.
Joel Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:12:18 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 65xx or 76xx for 'Distribution
Hi,
SRB2 came out a handful of days ago. Anyone care to comment on
stability and bugs fixed or created?
Half a million bugs fixed, give or take. ;-)
So far it's running smoothly. The issues we've seen with SRB and SRB1
have all been addressed in SRB2. Haven't noticed any new ones so far.
CPU
Feeling just a little stupid here. I'm wanting to gather the 5min. Average
packets-per-second data from individual interfaces on 29xx switches via
SNMP. The data is available via sh int but I can't for the life of me
seem to find a corresponding oid. Maybe I'm reading the MIBs wrong, but I
just
Hi Andrew,
I'm using ifInUcastPkts (1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.11) and ifOutUcastPkts
(1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.17) on my 29xx's with MRTG. That grabs unicast
packets.
I also grab these iods:
ifInNUcastPkts (1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.12) // Not Unicast packets,
ifOutNUcastPkts (1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.18) // aka,
WS-C3750G-12S-E = 12 k$
ME-3400G-12CS-A + Metro IP Access = 10 k$
Then add the price of a RPS2300 to the 3750.
You'd still be missing stackwise
Stacking IMO isn't so important. If you need that density, you'd
likely be looking at another platform anyway. But YMMV, of cause.
and I guess
Hi,
Does anyone happen to know the routing table size capacity of the ME-3400G
series ?
I am wondering if the box will be able to take full BGP table, which I very
much doubt it will be.
Will be really appreciate any input on this.
Regards,
ZH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
The SDM templates are used for route table sizing. The total number
listed is approximate number and the number of entries will depend on
mask length and prefixes.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6580/products_configuration_guide_
chapter09186a008087831f.html
-Original Message-
Does anyone happen to know the routing table size capacity of the ME-3400G
series ?
9K routes. See:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6580/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008087831f.html
I am wondering if the box will be able to take full BGP table, which I very
much doubt it
This is my first post on this list.
I have a Cisco 7206vxr Router which I am using to terminate DSL connections
on my ATM DS3 via PPPoE. I have everything setup and working properly, but
I am wanting to use my DHCP server instead of using the IP Pool on the cisco
router. Is this possible? I
Thanks for any contributions here.
This is hypothetical and not production. Assume a single company with
hundreds of remote sites. With today's MPLS environments you have 100's of
sites(T1's) coming back into a single physical interface(DS3) on the router.
I am applying my QoS policies
Posting here since nobody on Groupstudy is responding...
Anyone taken this test recently? Any pointers? I think the passing score is
825. I just finished reading the exam certification guide and WOW, is it
different than the old Top Down Design book!
-C
Does anyone know the restrictions on the number of VLAN mappings
possible on the 3750 Metro platform?
Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
Any suggestions, or should I forget about vlan mapping on
6148A?
I believe VLAN Tanslation isn't supported on the 6148A, and that
is supported by the fact
Duracom Lists wrote:
This is my first post on this list.
I have a Cisco 7206vxr Router which I am using to terminate DSL connections
on my ATM DS3 via PPPoE. I have everything setup and working properly, but
I am wanting to use my DHCP server instead of using the IP Pool on the cisco
Duracom Lists wrote:
This is my first post on this list.
I have a Cisco 7206vxr Router which I am using to terminate DSL connections
on my ATM DS3 via PPPoE. I have everything setup and working properly, but
I am wanting to use my DHCP server instead of using the IP Pool on the cisco
30 matches
Mail list logo
