Got it, seems to work well, thanks all
- Original Message
From: Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk
To: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:46:59 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 interfaces not showing as down
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at
1) I do not want to hear from resellers - I would like to hear from users -
where do you buy your used Cisco equipment?
2) How do you handle IOS downloads for used equipment? What do you need to
buy from Cisco for this?
3) What about servicing? Does Cisco offer service contracts on someone
Hi,
Anyone working in a service provider or telco and done the CCIE (service
provider)? I'm thinking of doing this, but am not sure of value/differences
with say the CCIE (routing/switching) track.
Any comments, opinions will be appreciated.
Regards,
Gabb.
Stay connected to the
hey man ,
please contact de...@fasttelco.net he has 2 CCIE , service provider and RS
Best Regards,
Mohammad Khalil
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:17:46 -0800
From: gabbarsingh9...@yahoo.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] CCIE tracks
Hi,
Anyone working in a service provider
Dear All,
Is there any issue with L2TP in Cisco1841 ? I am using
c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.124-16.bin IOS.
I am facing drops after few successive ping packets.
Can it be MTU issues?? I tried with global config ip tcp
path-mtu-discovery to address if it is MTU issue but in vain.
Regards,
Hi,
I am trying to run TCL IVR v2.0 script. The voice/audio is not heard. TCL
IVR application seems to run ok but don't hear voice for the reason Stream
Association Failed: Requested codec=0x5=g711ulaw, Negotiated
codec=0x=No Code.
How to set codec g711ulaw in gateway? The dial-peer is
A dial peer pots cannot have a codec
You need to place it the voip dial peer.
The defualt codec is g729 , you can change it by setting a default codec clas
using
voice class codec
Regards
Brian
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hey Gabb
I've worked for two internet providers (one was a telco) - and attempted the SP
lab exam in
November. And I must say, majority of the topics in the blueprint are used in
the real world.
I haven't attempted RS yet - but from what I understand SP concentrates more
on bgp, and in
Hi
How can I know SNMP OID cpumen and maybe pps on 6500 each module.
Somebody help me.
Thanks,
Charuntorn
--
Network Operation Center (NC)
Internet Thailand Public Company Limited
Tel : +662-257-7111
Fax : +662-257-7275
Hi,
we need to connect a cash box to a cisco router. It seems there is an
solution using the aux port auf the router for this.
I got a config for a router but something seems missing or not correct. We
want to use service pad to-xot and pad from-xot
The thing is that im a total X25 idiot, so
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:49:30PM -0500, Manuel Mar?n wrote:
Hi Phil
Attached are the SVI and interface configs
#TRUNK TO CISCO 3750
interface GigabitEthernet6/24
description Barrancas
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 1000
mls
I have a project where I need to implement a shared IP SAN (ISCSI)
network of about a dozen users with various clients.
Since everything is in one colo, I'd like to keep this simple by
keeping it layer2 as much as possible and not get into the mess of
having the client have to use routes
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:58:58AM -0500, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Of course I'm open to any other suggestions on securing this at L2,
keeping in mind two things. The ISCSI target cannot talk VLANing and
cannot be multihomed. (I guess it makes best use via MPIO in the
ISCSI protocol) It
On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
I'd strongly suggest you reconsider the bias against L3 serperation.
It's vastly simpler and, so long as you are doing hardware forwarding
on the 6500, it has no performance impact. I've got a few VLANs of
iSCSI installations that work like
I'm trying to assess the best options on implementing site redundancy to the
network default-originate for all my MPLS sites Internet traffic.I'm
trying to validate if I could have 2 CE's within the MPLS network using the
default-originate and supply the best path.
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Hey all ,
im trying to use Cisco ACS v3.3 as a radius with modification of av-pair
attributes ??
can this be done ? anyone has a document that assist in this ??
thanks in advance
_
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends
Does the SRA IOS version works for the cisco 6513? Checking the cisco download
section for the cisco 6513 it seems that only SXH, SXF and SXI are available
for 6513 with WS-SUP720-3BXL
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Snarskii [mailto:s...@snar.spb.ru]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: IronPort Encryption Appliance / PostX and
PXE Encryption Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090114-ironport
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 January 14 1600 UTC (GMT
Brad, Thanks for the reply and the thought process. I think to keep it simple
all I want is to do one site primary and the other standby only.
From: Brad Hedlund [mailto:brhed...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wed 1/14/2009 12:14 PM
To: Scott Ingram;
On 1/14/09 11:19 AM, Scott Ingram sing...@clayton.com wrote:
I think to keep it simple
all I want is to do one site primary and the other standby only.
Scott,
I'm sure the SP guys will jump in at this point but that should be a fairly
straight forward setup, where the standby site's PE is
I'm intrested in buying the following cards
AS535-DFC-8CE1
AS5XM-VUFC-108NP
But supplier is quoting for instead:
AS54-DFC-8CE1 and
AS54-DFC/VUFC-108NP
Is there any difference between the above mentioned cards.
I'm configuring my first 3560s, and am a little shocked to see that
per-port output policing (via service-policy output policyname) as we've
done for years on 3550s isn't permitted on the 3560.
Trying it results in
police command is not supported for this interface
Configuration failed!
Hi All,
I'd appreciate your feedback on Cisco's vrf selection feature ( http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/vrfselec.html
).
I'm planning to use it on 7609/Sup720-3B/PFC3 for diverting traffic
over LDP LSP (MPLS L3 VPN) to wholesale ISP partners. I'm interested
if
I noticed this option today but can not find a real life use for it ?
Anyone using it and might shed some light ?
regards
Kevin
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
If I have a Tacacs and syslogs servers available via VPN and would like
a remote PIX running 6.x code, how would I source the traffic?
I see you can source the interface, but will this send it through the
VPN or just send it out the inside interface?
*tacacs-server (inside) host
hmm. Then is there any purpose for having a loopback interface on a 2960?
I am able to configure one, along with the default gateway.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:33 PM, James Baker james.ba...@chelmer.co.nzwrote:
Hi Adam
Loopback is only available on Layer 3 devices. Refer:
Hello all,
Can you please recommend a process by which one should properly
dispose old Cisco kit, preferably by selling to refurbishing vendors
etc. South Africa or EMEA preffered.
Regards,
Pavel Skovajsa
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
I tried this once as a 'last shot' solution for a problem I was
encountering, across gig network with sustained traffic rate over the
tunnel of around 80Mbps. CPU instantly skyrocketed and the switch cried
no more. The switch had very minimal other traffic (around 20Mbps) and
very basic config, no
On 12/01/2009, at 1:15 PM, Tony wrote:
A previous poster suggested 25-30 users per AP. A quick search
reveals quite a few credible sites with similar figures. I'm sure
you can do the math, that's quite a few AP's.
Yup, 30 per 1200 class AP is a fair number. Thats the sort of density
we
Make sure to source it from a ip addres that can send traffic over the
VPN
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:09 PM, ChrisSerafin ch...@chrisserafin.com
wrote:
If I have a Tacacs and syslogs servers available via VPN and would
like a remote PIX running 6.x code, how would I
Yes they work. You need to look under the 7600 IOS options.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Manuel Marín
Sent: quarta-feira, 14 de Janeiro
Jon Lewis wrote:
I'm configuring my first 3560s...
you can't police the output of a port
you can't even define an output service-policy for a port.
This is correct as far as I'm aware.
It appears the 3560-way to do this is to use srr-queue bandwidth
shape on the interface, but the syntax
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Brad Henshaw wrote:
you can't police the output of a port
you can't even define an output service-policy for a port.
This is correct as far as I'm aware.
This is awfully disappointing considering the 3560 is supposed to be the
successor to the 3550.
You can try the
Jon Lewis wrote:
That also won't work in this special case, as the
rate-limiting/shaping is only to be done on a class of traffic,
and only if that traffic has to egress through a particular
port. Under normal conditions, the traffic won't need to be
shaped.
In that case I think you're
Not that I am mentioning anything that hasn't been discovered, but here are two
great articles about it:
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/02/23/catalyst-qos-3550-explained/#more-81
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/tag/3550/
Neither one of them answers your question, but I think with
What's the difference between normal and special condition. As in are you able
to do something with it, where it could go either to a shaped queue or a shared
queue based on its DSCP for example?
From: Brad Henshaw brad.hens...@qcn.com.au
To: Jon Lewis
36 matches
Mail list logo
