[c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

Hi all, I got hooked into this BGP route server implementation. Any working configuration that you can share with me to remove the ASN of the route server when relaying the BGP routes among the route server clients? Thanks. :-)

[c-nsp] asci

Hi all ! I have cisco WS-C3560G-24TS (PowerPC405) processor (revision D0) with 122880K/8184K bytes of memory. CPU utilization for five seconds: 7%/0%; one minute: 7%; five minutes: 7% Erros and drops have not on physical ifnterfaces at all. But have growing drops asic - show controllers

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

On 09/06/2010 07:17, Yap Chin Hoong - wrote: Hi all, I got hooked into this BGP route server implementation. Any working configuration that you can share with me to remove the ASN of the route server when relaying the BGP routes among the route server clients? Thanks. :-) You can't currently

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

Hi Nick, Thanks for replying and and your docs on route-server are really nice. Seriously I feel that not that many people discuss about route-servers. :-) I will close this topic and move on to other BGP topics. Thanks and have a nice day. :-) regards,YapCH Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:50:39

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

On 09/06/2010 11:29, Yap Chin Hoong - wrote: Thanks for replying and and your docs on route-server are really nice. Seriously I feel that not that many people discuss about route-servers. :-) I will close this topic and move on to other BGP topics. Thanks and have a nice day. :-) route

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

On 9 Jun 2010, at 06:32, Nick Hilliard wrote: route servers are a little specialised which is why you don't get a lot of discussion about them on a mailing list like this. However, the IXPs have been doing quite a lot of work with them over the last 2-3 years. Check out the RIPE and NANOG

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

On 09/06/2010 14:38, Sharlon Carty wrote: But if you remove the ASN of the route server how would the clients peer with it? NLRI updates will normally include the remote ASN in the AS path. For a connection into a route server, this is removed, so prefixes from the route server will look like

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and the Catalyst 4506e

I think I almost got it... is there any equivalent for aggregate policers for the Sup6e QoS? I've got something in the config now, but I'm not sure it's really going to have the desired effect. Steve Pfister Technical Coordinator, The Office of Information Technology Dayton Public Schools 115

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100609-uccx Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2010 June 09 1600 UTC (GMT

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Application Extension Platform Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Application Extension Platform Privilege Escalation Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100609-axp Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2010 June 09 1600 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] HSRP On Bonded ADSL Iterface

Am 07.06.2010 23:23, schrieb Christopher Gatlin: When forced to deal with them I use IP SLA to track an IP object out the primary link. When the object isn't reachable the default static route is revoked from the route table and a pre-staged static default with a high admin distance will send

[c-nsp] L3VPN over RSVP

Hi lets say that I have a standard cisco MPLS network with route-reflectors reflecting the L3VPN routes. Is there some way to have just single vrf (hub to spoke) running over RSVP for faster reconversion's in case of failures? and the other vrf are just relying on the standard LDP based

Re: [c-nsp] HSRP On Bonded ADSL Iterface

Hi, I agree with Gerald. We do it the same way here for clients with multiple DSL access links (cf. template bellow) : track 1 interface Dialer1 ip routing ! track 2 interface Dialer2 ip routing ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 track 1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer2 (XXX) track 2

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN over RSVP

Hi, In newer IOS version you can use the bgp next-hop command under the VRF configuration. It would allow you to select a different loopback as the nexthop of that specific VRF. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/command/reference/mp_a1.html#wp 1011653 If you make that loopback route

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN over RSVP

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 18:20, Arie Vayner (avayner) avay...@cisco.com wrote: In older releases, where this command is not available you can apply a route-map on the output direction of the BGP session to the RR, match the RT of the VRF, and set a different next-hop. It would do the same as

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and the Catalyst 4506e

Sorry, I've never tried to implement aggregate policers on this platform. S On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Steven Pfister spfis...@dps.k12.oh.uswrote: I think I almost got it... is there any equivalent for aggregate policers for the Sup6e QoS? I've got something in the config now, but I'm

[c-nsp] IDB's on ISR2's

Hey all, This document has always been useful: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_tech_note09186a0080094322.shtml But it has no details on ISR2's, or IOS 15.x. I've been searching for an hour now... and can't find anything. Specifically I need to know the IDB

[c-nsp] Shaping not working as expected

I'm trying to keep this short so hopefully I don't leave out some critical detail. I have a hierarchical policy-map applied to a 100 mb interface which only has 15mb available from the provider so the parent link needs to be shaped to 15mb. The classes need as follows: VOIP needs 1mb priority,

Re: [c-nsp] Shaping not working as expected

On Jun 9, 2010, at 9:23 PM, John Lange wrote: But somehow, show policy-map interface shows me that DORMS is exceeding its limit and shaping is not active even though the packets are matching. How can that be possible? ... Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M),

[c-nsp] policy-maps on dCEF platforms

Hi, All! I have the folowing porblem on Cisco 7600 with RSP720-3CXL-GE. IOS 12.2(33)SRD4 Advanced IP Services From config: ! policy-map xx class class-default police cir 1024 bc 192 be 384 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop violate-action drop ! !