sh ip pim tunnel might give you more info.
In later releases i have seen two tunnels (pim encap/decap) created
automatically.
--
Tassos
Ivan wrote on 12/08/2010 07:22:
I was working on a ISR 1941 with 15.0(1)M2. I am running DMVPN on it
and using one tunnel interface. (Tunnel 1). No other
only for fixing:
maybe add to your list sh run inter tu0 , sh run inter tu2, etc for all
your mysterious tunnels and a sh run full, edit to remove any trace of
mystery, copy it as startup-config in your nvram,
then reload the router.
if you want to go to extremes, you can erase the config all
My understanding of SOO was that if a vrf-if of a PE is configured with SOO
and a route with the same SOO-value is received, this received route will
not be placed into the vrf RIB.
Is this not correct ?
The issue is that a route propagated by CE10(10.10.10.10) is seen in CE11
even though on
Hi Pavel.
is there any recommended/best practices for module placement in
CAT6509 chassis? For example, FWSM in slot 3, ACE in slot 2 etc etc..
The Catalyst 6500 (and 7600) reserves power for supervisors in both slot
5 and 6 even if you only have one sup. This means you should use the
On 12/08/2010 13:21, RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina wrote:
Hi all,
I'm BGP multihomed with 2 ISPs and have a /18 subnet.
I declared the /18 block in RIPE database as 64 /24.
I'm adding a new ISP and he asked me to modify the 64 /24 in RIPE to a
unique /18.
How does this change affect the existing
Hi
If you advertise the /18 to one ISP (a) and the /24 to another ISP (b), you
will find that all your traffic will enter via the 2nd ISP (b) as it will be
the more specific routes in global BGP tables.
Is there a reason you wanted to use 64x /24's in the first place?
Cheers
Heath
On 12
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 15:21 +0300, RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina wrote:
Hi all,
I'm BGP multihomed with 2 ISPs and have a /18 subnet.
I declared the /18 block in RIPE database as 64 /24.
I'm adding a new ISP and he asked me to modify the 64 /24 in RIPE to
a unique /18.
The RIPE database is
(20100811) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5360 (20100812) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Hi Group,
A doubt/curiosity, what happens in a router that you are setting up IGP's ,
and you dont hardcode the router-id, thus
it will look for an IPv4 address to use as a router-id, but what if I dont
have any IPv4 address configured? Where will
it come from?
Rgs,
Hi Jeferson,
If you do not have any IPv4 address configured on the box, you absolutely need
to configure the router-id explicitly.
Regards
Le 2010-08-12 à 10:50, Jeferson Guardia a écrit :
Hi Group,
A doubt/curiosity, what happens in a router that you are setting up IGP's ,
and you
Thanks guys, just didnt have time to lab this up and was wondering as I am
going through some ipv6 topics.
Cheers,
2010/8/12 Harold Ritter hrit...@cisco.com
Hi Jeferson,
If you do not have any IPv4 address configured on the box, you absolutely
need to configure the router-id explicitly.
If a router has no IPv4 addresses to 'borrow' and use as a convenient 32bit
value, you must manually configure the RID.
/TJ
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:50, Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Group,
A doubt/curiosity, what happens in a router that you are setting up IGP's ,
and
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jeferson Guardia wrote:
Hi Group,
A doubt/curiosity, what happens in a router that you are setting up IGP's ,
and you dont hardcode the router-id, thus
it will look for an IPv4 address to use as a router-id, but what if I dont
have any IPv4 address configured? Where
Be careful with that. I worked with a customer who did this and then decided
to upgrade to dual Sup's.
As you can imagine, it turned out to be a *huge* exercise that involved
multiple downtime windows and configuration modifications (read verification
windows) across the board for each Sup add.
I'm trying to come up with a best practices method of building a
stock configuration for customer T1 CPE.
The idea is to use Frame Relay over a T1, have 2 DLCI's defined - one
to a management IP wrapped inside a VRF on each end. Ideally, I'd
like the CPE router to learn it's IP during
I have a questing about internal DSCP on a 6500 that I'm not really sure
about. I know that it's used to identify the priority of a frame/packet as
it transits the switch but I have read on some sites that the internal DSCP
is copied to the frame/packet as it leaves the switch. On other sites
We're looking for a dynamic network mapping tool that does not require
a large amount of hand-holding and manpower to manage. I don't care if
this is a free or paid product. Ideally, I'd like something that
autodiscovers the network including L2 and L3 devices, then
intelligently maps them. I used
mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5360 (20100812) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32
was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5360 (20100812) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus
NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5358 (20100811) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5360 (20100812) __
The message was checked
database 5358 (20100811) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5360 (20100812) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Hi PA,
Not sure where your quotes are coming from. The 2nd one is a bit
misleading IMO, it sort of mangles the concepts of PFC classification
egress port QoS.
It refers to a specific behavior around matching remarked DSCP in an
egress ACL. That is not possible w/o a recirculation.
This
Anyone have recommendation on any application that can push out config
changes to many many routers? Mostly interested in keeping ACL
consistent between about 50 ~ 100 routers. My google skill has failed
me on this one.
Thanks!
___
cisco-nsp mailing
CiscoWorks LMS or even RANCID will work for this. On a box with RANCID
installed it's done like so:
for host in router1 router2 router3; do clogin -cconfig t;no ip
access list extended asdf;ip access list extended asdf permit any
any;end;write mem ${host}; done
-saxon
On 12 August 2010 13:09,
I used to use DeviceAuthority from AlterPoint a few years ago. It was
a really good product for this type of thing. It's pretty expensive
now, though.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have recommendation on any application that can push out config
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jay Nakamura
Sent: den 12 augusti 2010 21:10
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] App to manage pushing out changes
Anyone have recommendation on any application that can push
Tim thanks for your response, I think I'm starting to get it.
So basically if you do ingress marking with an ACL by default it will not
use that marking on egress unless you use an egress acl for remarked packets
using 'platform ip features sequential'?
What about for the following, would the
Hi Paul, please see inline below:
At 12:40 PM 8/12/2010, P.A averred:
Tim thanks for your response, I think I'm starting to get it.
So basically if you do ingress marking with an ACL by default it will not
use that marking on egress unless you use an egress acl for remarked packets
using
Try cattools.
Sharlon Carty
ICT Technician
P.O. Box 1110
Soualiga Boulevard #5
Pond Island, Philipsburg,
St. Maarten, Netherlands Antilles
Mobile: +599 527-4002
E-mail: sharlon.ca...@telemgroup.an
http://www.telemgroup.an/
Yeah-- if it's for a non-linux person, or someone that wants a canned cheap
package...
Cattools is the way to go..
I have used it to update configs in close to 100 devices at a time...
Even gone so far as having databases for multiple customers
Simple stuff to really wild stuff
Jim
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:24:24PM -0600, Saxon Jones wrote:
CiscoWorks LMS or even RANCID will work for this. On a box with RANCID
installed it's done like so:
for host in router1 router2 router3; do clogin -cconfig t;no ip
access list extended asdf;ip access list extended asdf permit any
With cisco concentrator 3030 works ok, sometimes it get disconnected but
not a big deal ,you can always reconnect.
No problems for me at all, neither the people in the office using it
over ubuntu.
El 10/08/10 18:16, Quinn Snyder escribió:
network-manager-vpnc
in the ubuntu repos.
little
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software TCP Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100812-tcp
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100812-tcp.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 August 12 2130 UTC (GMT
Hi Group,
I've just received a Cisco router 1861:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5853/ps8321/product_data_sheet0900aecd806c4dce.html
This router have two BRI ports. I've tried to configure a Dial Backup using
this ports but I received the follow messages:
I am having weird routing issues with the T1 circuits. We use /30 subnets for
all T1 circuits, so for customer X with assigned subnet of x.x.x.176/30,
x.x.x.177 is the serial interface on the ISP end of the circuit. The ISP side
of the router is defined thusly:
interface Serial6/0/16:0
35 matches
Mail list logo
