On 19/09/2012 02:42, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
You forgot the consequences of getting some other element of the
config wrong because you were preoccupied with the MD5 key.
I'll take simplicity every time.
One good use for MD5 is to stop people at Internet Exchanges from hijacking
old bgp
Hi All!!!
Can anybody explain upgrade procedure for CiscoWorks LMS. I have CiscoWorks
LMS 3.2 and I want to upgrade software up to 4.2 So what do I need for it?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Just would like to ask whether it's common or not to create MIPs at customer
Level (Level 6 or Level 7)
Thanks
adam
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco AnyConnect
Secure Mobility Client
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120620-ac
Revision 2.0
Last Updated 2012 September 19 16:01 UTC (GMT)
For Public Release 2012 June 20 16:00 UTC (GMT)
I have an interface on a 4948 that is reporting increasing giants and
input errors. The MTU is the default 1500 and so is the interface on
the other side of the link. This is a dot1q trunk, if that is
relevant.
7600 Side:
GigabitEthernet3/3 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is
Hi,
Do not think so.
At level 6,7 you need CFM , but this is end2end.
Konstantin
От: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] от
имени Adam Vitkovsky [adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Отправлено: 19 сентября 2012 г. 19:08
To:
Would double tagging (qnq) sitting atop g3/3 (service instances or svi's)
cause this? Or mpls-enabled svi's sitting on top of g3/3 perhaps ?
(brainstorming as I'm not sure what to make of it)
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
If I have a VM physical server I can team two nics and then do a port
channel on the switch.
Can this be done if I have two switches?
example: switch - server - switch
|---|
TIA
Scott
___
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote:
If I have a VM physical server I can team two nics and then do a port
channel on the switch.
Can this be done if I have two switches?
You can use active-standby; just tag the interfaces with the same VLAN.
With Catalyst
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:48 -0700, Scott Voll wrote:
If I have a VM physical server I can team two nics and then do a port
channel on the switch.
Can this be done if I have two switches?
That would require switches capable of cooperating more than usual.
Matts suggestions of 3750 Stackwise
What if you have all the VM Nic's are setup as Trunks so the VMware team
can place the new VM's on the network that is needed? Does that affect any
of this? Currently I have a 4506E and was planning on either a stack of
3750's or another 4506E. Thoughts?
Scott
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:00 PM,
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:24 -0700, Scott Voll wrote:
What if you have all the VM Nic's are setup as Trunks so the VMware
team can place the new VM's on the network that is needed? Does that
affect any of this? Currently I have a 4506E and was planning on
either a stack of 3750's or another
We did cross-chassis port channels on 3750s for years. However, the new
vCenter/ESX 5+ has this automatic link balancing thing. You setup the
trunks all the same, no need for port-channels, and the vCenter host
load-balances the vlans/hosts across the available links.
Kinda ugly from the switch
We just bought a bundle of 2x 5548Ps and 20x 2248s in order to converge our
data and storage networks in our new datacenter. After carefully reading the
configuration limitations document and designing around the limitations for our
migration, we pulled the trigger and bought the material. The
14 matches
Mail list logo
