Re: [c-nsp] Multicast
Hi allI have found out why this was happening , I already configured MPLS TE in my network and that's why the RPF check failure occured ! BR, CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net From: thegame...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:03:13 -0400 To: gunner_...@live.com I've seen that before when the RPF interface is one where PIM is not enabled. Have you double checked to make sure that PIM is up, working, and has neighbors on all of the interfaces (don't forget loopbacks)? David Barak Sent from a mobile device, please forgive autocorrection. On Apr 15, 2013, at 4:53 AM, M K gunner_...@live.com wrote: The Unicast routing table is fine , I have checked all OSPF enabled and routes are advertised correctlyI am wondering if R3 is suffering from RPF check , why the rp mapping appeared ? R3#sh ip rpf 9.9.0.7RPF information for ? (9.9.0.7) RPF interface: GigabitEthernet0/0.34 RPF neighbor: ? (9.9.34.4) RPF route/mask: 9.9.0.7/32 RPF type: unicast (ospf 9) Doing distance-preferred lookups across tables RPF topology: ipv4 multicast base, originated from ipv4 unicast base R6#sh ip rpf 9.9.0.7 failed, no route existsR6#ping 9.9.0.7 souR6#ping 9.9.0.7 source lo0Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 9.9.0.7, timeout is 2 seconds:Packet sent with a source address of 9.9.0.6 !Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/20/52 ms From: gunner_...@live.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Multicast Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:21:19 +0300 Hi allI have the below topology R2 -- R3 -- R5 | | |R7 -- R4 -- R6 I have enabled multicast-routing on all the topology (ip pim sparse-mode on all interfaces)I have configured R7 to be my RP ip pim bsr-candidate Loopback0 0ip pim rp-candidate Loopback0 priority 200 Now , the issue is on R3 i have turned on R3 debug ip pim bsr R3#sh ip pim rp mapping PIM Group-to-RP Mappings Group(s) 224.0.0.0/4 RP 9.9.0.7 (?), v2Info source: 9.9.0.7 (?), via bootstrap, priority 200, holdtime 150 Uptime: 07:48:54, expires: 00:02:27 I can see the rp mapping but in the log messages *Apr 15 09:10:07.395: PIM-BSR(0): bootstrap (9.9.0.7) on non-RPF path GigabitEthernet0/0.23 or from non-RPF neighbor 9.9.34.4 discarded*Apr 15 09:10:07.399: PIM-BSR(0): 9.9.0.7 bootstrap forwarded on Loopback0*Apr 15 09:10:07.403: PIM-BSR(0): 9.9.0.7 bootstrap forwarded on GigabitEthernet0/0.23*Apr 15 09:10:07.403: PIM-BSR(0): 9.9.0.7 bootstrap forwarded on GigabitEthernet0/0.35*Apr 15 09:10:07.407: PIM-BSR(0): bootstrap (9.9.0.7) on non-RPF path Loopback0 or from non-RPF neighbor 9.9.34.4 discarded ? On R5 and R6 , i cannot see any informationR5#sh ip pim rp mapping PIM Group-to-RP Mappings BR, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone
Beware of one thing 6PE can not do. BGPv6 over multi-hop will not work as there is no recursive lookup from v6 too v4 in your BGP speaker. This is a feature, not a bug... so it will not be fixed. Otherwise 6PE is a breeze. On 14 April 2013 21:56, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Expert, We are planning to deploy IPv6 at our IPv4 Backbone, our PE to as Dual Stack and carry IPv6 packet through MPLS label. There are different scenarios, one of them is 6PE. Would you please guide me from where can i start ? Thanks, Ahmed ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Config template utility?
Hi, Looking for any recommendations for a template utility - i.e., for adding new vrf's, interfaces, vlans to switches etc? Where you just enter in variables (eg, vrf name, rd), and a pre-defined template is generated with the variables entered. Has anyone used Solarwinds network config manager? Cisco Template Manager? (http://www.gelogic.net/?page_id=3) Thanks. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Config template utility?
I use the template toolkit perl module. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Switchport trunk allowed issues
Hi I am writing a EEM using Cisco ios cli, can anyone have valuable suggestion about how to materialize it. Following is the topic Using following command on switch i.e switchport trunk allowed vlan add/remove/all/except/none range However, if one forgets to include the add/remove/all/except/none keyword, the command defaults to replace: switchport trunk allowed vlan range the VLAN that has already been placed on vlan deleted and result in downtime I would like to disable the use of: switchport trunk allowed vlan range, and replace it with a custom EEM command like: 1. switchport trunk allowed vlan none. 2. switchport trunk allowed vlan add add range 3. switchport trunk allowed vlan add remove range This would correct a dangerous IOS syntax. Looking forward Ami Norway ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Slow Inter-Vlan traffic
HHi, We’re having some issues with inter-vlan traffic going pretty slow on 6504-E chassis working in VSS (VS-S720-10G / WS-X6748-GE-TX), running IOS version 12.2(33)SXH5. Here’s the thing : We have added 2 new Vlans on the swtichs (Vlan 41 : Production / Vlan 95 : Admin). Our customer told us that things are going pretty slow on both vlans (we have seen 1.5Mbits/s of maximum bandwidth on Vlan 41). Looking forward we saw that there is no distributed cache traffic on the SVIs : #sh interfaces Vlan41 stats Vlan41 Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out Processor 649544280562 1553329976305 Route cache6116040 5895931568427463 10028760624 Distributed cache 0 0 0 0 Total6180994 5938737188582795 10038736929 #sh interfaces Vlan95 stats Vlan95 Switching pathPkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out Processor 732380 468870182009253 128644656 Route cache8377033 49514069345756730 480387249 Distributed cache 0 0 0 0 Total9109413 49982939527765983 609031905 On older (working well) SVIs added on the switchs we saw that packets are going to distributed cache. I’m not a expert on this but as far as I understand I can see that our linecards are working in acef mode and that cef is enabled on the 2 new SVIs (the sh cef interface output is the same on all the SVIs configured on the switchs) : #sh cef interface Vlan 41 Vlan41 is up (if_number 460) Corresponding hwidb fast_if_number 460 Corresponding hwidb firstsw-if_number 460 Internet address is X.X.X.X/X ICMP redirects are always sent IP unicast RPF check is disabled Output features: HW Shortcut Installation Inbound access list is not set Outbound access list is not set IP policy routing is disabled BGP based policy accounting on input is disabled BGP based policy accounting on output is disabled Hardware idb is Vlan41 Fast switching type 22, interface type 147 IP CEF switching enabled IP CEF switching turbo vector IP Null turbo vector IP prefix lookup IPv4 mtrie generic Input fast flags 0x0, Output fast flags 0x0 ifindex 459(459) Slot unknown (-1) Slot unit 41 VC -1 Transmit limit accumulator 0x0 (0x0) IP MTU 1500 #sh cef interface vlan 95 Vlan95 is up (if_number 455) Corresponding hwidb fast_if_number 455 Corresponding hwidb firstsw-if_number 455 Internet address is X.X.X.X/X ICMP redirects are always sent IP unicast RPF check is disabled Output features: HW Shortcut Installation Inbound access list is not set Outbound access list is not set IP policy routing is disabled BGP based policy accounting on input is disabled BGP based policy accounting on output is disabled Hardware idb is Vlan95 Fast switching type 22, interface type 147 IP CEF switching enabled IP CEF switching turbo vector IP Null turbo vector IP prefix lookup IPv4 mtrie generic Input fast flags 0x0, Output fast flags 0x0 ifindex 454(454) Slot unknown (-1) Slot unit 95 VC -1 Transmit limit accumulator 0x0 (0x0) IP MTU 1500 Moreover the “show ip cef vlan” output show that the good prefixes are attached to the SVIs. We also saw in the “show interface vlan” output that there are no “L3 in/out Switched” packets going through. We would like to know where we could look to find the origin of this problem. Any Idea would be appreciated. Thanks. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Switchport trunk allowed issues
On 17/04/13 12:08, amir agha wrote: Hi I am writing a EEM using Cisco ios cli, can anyone have valuable suggestion about how to materialize it. Following is the topic Using following command on switch i.e switchport trunk allowed vlan add/remove/all/except/none range However, if one forgets to include the add/remove/all/except/none keyword, the command defaults to replace: switchport trunk allowed vlan range the VLAN that has already been placed on vlan deleted and result in downtime I would like to disable the use of: switchport trunk allowed vlan range, and replace it with a custom EEM command like: 1. switchport trunk allowed vlan none. 2. switchport trunk allowed vlan add add range 3. switchport trunk allowed vlan add remove range This would correct a dangerous IOS syntax. I don't know the specific answer to your question, except that I think it *is* possible to intercept CLI commands with EEM and stop them - no idea how though. An easy alternative is; alias interface tagvlan switchport trunk allowed vlan add alias interface detagvlan switchport trunk allowed vlan remove ...then train your staff to do: int Gi9/1 tagvlan 100 detagvlan 101 Or use TACACS to block the dangerous pattern. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Slow Inter-Vlan traffic
On 17/04/13 12:21, Sébastien MALHEIRO wrote: #sh interfaces Vlan41 stats #sh cef interface Vlan 41 You have to be a bit careful with these types of commands on 6500. Some of them show software state, some of them hardware state, and it requires some experience to know which. It sounds like one or both of the new SVIs are being forwarded on CPU. Check the output of sh run int xxx and try a shut / no shut. It could be a software bug or TCAM mis-program, or you've configured a feature which has disabled hardware forwarding. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] EEM applet for Vlan for switches
Hi In routers for writing EEM applet through Cisco IOS Cli we normally use following command event manager applet (name) trap Does anyone has idea or suggestion that which command is used on Switches to write EEM applet through Cisco IOS Cli as the above mentioned command is not working on switches. What is the syntax?? Any solid and concrete suggestion.? Ami Norway ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Switchport trunk allowed issues
On 17 April 2013 14:08, amir agha monito...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Ami, However, if one forgets to include the add/remove/all/except/none keyword, the command defaults to replace: switchport trunk allowed vlan range the VLAN that has already been placed on vlan deleted and result in downtime Many have solved same problem in TACACS. permit trunk allowed vlan add.* permit trunk allowed vlan remove.* permit trunk allowed vlan all.* permit trunk allowed vlan none.* permit trunk allowed vlan except.* deny trunk allowed vlan .* -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] EEM applet for Vlan for switches
Hi, Does anyone has idea or suggestion that which command is used on Switches to write EEM applet through Cisco IOS Cli as the above mentioned command is not working on switches. What is the syntax?? WHAT switches are you dealing with as many dont have any EEM ability alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Network Admission Control Manager SQL Injection Vulnerability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Network Admission Control Manager SQL Injection Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20130417-nac Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2013 April 17 16:00 UTC (GMT) +-- Summary === Cisco Network Admission Control (NAC) Manager contains a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and take full control of the vulnerable system. A successful attack could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access, create or modify any information in the NAC Manager database. Cisco has released free software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds for this vulnerability. This advisory is available at the following link: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130417-nac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlFu1FEACgkQUddfH3/BbTr/jwD/UmdJ5/x0iKBt+h5P7CyDoCw1 XjSDuB/0AXMfEQLCIXIA/3eqYPgDyYs6Np3C/LGVU/HPNYsC7u7HQ/bV599WGwwb =RRHX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco TelePresence Infrastructure Denial of Service Vulnerability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco TelePresence Infrastructure Denial of Service Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20130417-tpi Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2013 April 17 16:00 UTC (GMT) +-- Summary === Cisco TelePresence multipoint control unit (MCU) and Cisco TelePresence Server contain a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger the reload of an affected system. Cisco has released free software updates that address this vulnerability. Workarounds that mitigate this vulnerability are not available. This advisory is available at the following link: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130417-tpi -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlFu1F0ACgkQUddfH3/BbTrooAD9Hd1bHNtH6qE25KH2qSKx0Xd5 55+2JOZHT4CmjoVhaSMA+wWqGdVUbbtVtzIK0OZ4b/7tVRNtTmtoIjr9FA60WxWS =8gT5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Slow Inter-Vlan traffic
On 17/04/2013, at 21:21, Sébastien MALHEIRO s.mal...@gmail.com wrote: We’re having some issues with inter-vlan traffic going pretty slow on 6504-E chassis working in VSS (VS-S720-10G / WS-X6748-GE-TX), running IOS version 12.2(33)SXH5. This seems like a very old version - especially if you are running VSS. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Terminating lots of double-tagged vlans
All, I'm working on a project which uses GPON to connect tens of thousands of properties in a fibre-to-the-home environment. Each property will be handed off to me as a double-tagged vlan, one per property. Obviously I don't want to manually create tens of thousands of subinterfaces on a router, and I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. What I'd come up with is that I'd ignore the inner tags, and just use the outer S-Tag to put the properties into subnets (one per S-Tag), and then just do DHCP. However, I'm not quite sure how I'd achieve this. This is obviously a common problem for people to solve, so how do others sort it out? The devices I'd typically use include Cisco 6500/SUP720, ME3600, ASR1k, and smaller stuff like the 3750/3560. Any suggestions? Many thanks, Simon ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Terminating lots of double-tagged vlans
On Wed Apr 17, 2013 at 12:57:05PM -0700, Bruce Pinsky wrote: Simon Lockhart wrote: What I'd come up with is that I'd ignore the inner tags, and just use the outer S-Tag to put the properties into subnets (one per S-Tag), and then just do DHCP. However, I'm not quite sure how I'd achieve this. The devices I'd typically use include Cisco 6500/SUP720, ME3600, ASR1k, and smaller stuff like the 3750/3560. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/configuration/guide/lsw_ieee_802.1q.html#wp1027258 Oh, great, that makes things easy :) I didn't realise you could do that. Looks like what would work then is to plug the GPON handoff into an ME3600 and use the flexible vlan rewriting on that to ensure that the outer tag is unique for my network, then aggregate it through our existing L2 access switches into an ASR1k doing access routing. I think I must have been over-thinking the problem. Many thanks, Simon ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Terminating lots of double-tagged vlans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon Lockhart wrote: All, I'm working on a project which uses GPON to connect tens of thousands of properties in a fibre-to-the-home environment. Each property will be handed off to me as a double-tagged vlan, one per property. Obviously I don't want to manually create tens of thousands of subinterfaces on a router, and I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. What I'd come up with is that I'd ignore the inner tags, and just use the outer S-Tag to put the properties into subnets (one per S-Tag), and then just do DHCP. However, I'm not quite sure how I'd achieve this. This is obviously a common problem for people to solve, so how do others sort it out? The devices I'd typically use include Cisco 6500/SUP720, ME3600, ASR1k, and smaller stuff like the 3750/3560. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/configuration/guide/lsw_ieee_802.1q.html#wp1027258 - -- = bep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFu/pEACgkQE1XcgMgrtyYfzQCg+R40qBuc0FlafjNzgiPhPXTw tU8AoKK6pyoZFjBH8qFSNWXTzo8u+GDq =2xC3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP Filter - Best Practice
Hello Nick, Thanks for your reply, i am totally agree with you. Regards, Ahmed On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: On 15/04/2013 21:44, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: I am using Prefix-list and as-path for BGP filter. But if i apply Prefix-list as inbound filter at PE, then from PE to RR ( Route Reflector ) i apply as-path filter, i think it is more scalable than modify Prefix-list continuously ? or use community ? If my question not clear please ask me. it depends. Prefix lists are very fast because they are implemented as a trie, and it is very fast to look up an entry in a trie. Community lists can be fast (standard, i.e. integer comparison) or slow (extended, i.e. regular expression). as-path lists are slow because they use regular expressions. If you need to filter BGP updates, it is usually fastest to use prefix lists or standard community lists. It makes little difference whether you use extended communities or as-path lists - both are slow. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Switchport trunk allowed issues
Something like this should do the trick: event manager applet ALLOWED-VLAN event cli pattern switchport trunk allowed vlan +[0-9]+.* mode interface enter action 001 puts ERROR: switchport trunk allowed vlan is not allowed. Use Add/Remove action 002 set _exit_status 0 The regex on the cli pattern catches only the switchport trunk allowed vlan with numbers directly after the vlan keyword (skipping 1+ spaces). If you try the add/remove/none options the regexp would not match. I didn't test it too much, so please do before deploying in production. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of amir agha Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 04:08 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Switchport trunk allowed issues Hi I am writing a EEM using Cisco ios cli, can anyone have valuable suggestion about how to materialize it. Following is the topic Using following command on switch i.e switchport trunk allowed vlan add/remove/all/except/none range However, if one forgets to include the add/remove/all/except/none keyword, the command defaults to replace: switchport trunk allowed vlan range the VLAN that has already been placed on vlan deleted and result in downtime I would like to disable the use of: switchport trunk allowed vlan range, and replace it with a custom EEM command like: 1. switchport trunk allowed vlan none. 2. switchport trunk allowed vlan add add range 3. switchport trunk allowed vlan add remove range This would correct a dangerous IOS syntax. Looking forward Ami Norway ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 4500x - SFP-GE-T
Just an update to this - I have found some third party SFP's(Copper) that work without issue from NHR - They are specifically designed for the 4500x's (But also work fine in ASR's/4948's etc etc) SFP-GE-T-WIRE-NHR - 1000BASE-T SFP with wire clip (mainly for 4500X) From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 08:11:31 +1100 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 4500x - SFP-GE-T Looks like I spoke too soon - Some of the NHR ones get stuck also :( From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:03:33 +1100 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 4500x - SFP-GE-T To reply to my own post - Found some spare NHR SFP's, and they work as expected.if anyone has other alternatives they recommend, would be greatly appreciated. Now have 2 ports with stuck Turbo X SFP's :( From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:40:30 +1100 Subject: [c-nsp] 4500x - SFP-GE-T Hi Guys, Hoping someone out there is using SFP-GE-T's in a 4500-X that are able to be EASILY removed? I have some Turbo X ones that are impossible to remove from the 4500x (But they work fine in an ASR) Cheers. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Most Stable IOS-XR Version for ASR9K
Use the one in the CCIE-SP exam at least you can practise on it while using it ;) On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, Any idea which version is the most stable one currently, need to deploy new ASR9K inside the network, am considering to use which version. No need additional features, just normal OSPF, BGP, MPLS, MPLS/TE, MPLS/VPN. Thanks in advance. Regards, Hu Xu ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- -- Do you Think we Can Fly ? Well I Do. Eng. Mohamed A. Monsef Abbas Cisco Networks Engineer CCIE® #37569 (RS) CCNP® - CCIP® - CCDP® CS-RSSS® - IPv6-FGCE® ITIL® - ISO/IEC 27002® Cell Phone : +2 0109 255 Land Line : +2 02 24 66 2 33 8 eg.linkedin.com/pub/mohamed-a-monsef-abbas/25/456/a61/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Most Stable IOS-XR Version for ASR9K
Do you have a choice? 4.0.3 was stable for while then more issues came out. It has reached engineering support. You have to upgrade to 4.2.3 or 4.3.0. Version 4.3.0 has more feature for BNG. If you do not need it, you can stay with 4.2.3 but you have to install mandatory SMUs. -Judy From: Mohamed A. DAbbas m.abdelmon...@gmail.com To: Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Most Stable IOS-XR Version for ASR9K Use the one in the CCIE-SP exam at least you can practise on it while using it ;) On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, Any idea which version is the most stable one currently, need to deploy new ASR9K inside the network, am considering to use which version. No need additional features, just normal OSPF, BGP, MPLS, MPLS/TE, MPLS/VPN. Thanks in advance. Regards, Hu Xu ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- -- Do you Think we Can Fly ? Well I Do. Eng. Mohamed A. Monsef Abbas Cisco Networks Engineer CCIE® #37569 (RS) CCNP® - CCIP® - CCDP® CS-RSSS® - IPv6-FGCE® ITIL® - ISO/IEC 27002® Cell Phone : +2 0109 255 Land Line : +2 02 24 66 2 33 8 eg.linkedin.com/pub/mohamed-a-monsef-abbas/25/456/a61/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
