On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 07:41:08 PM Andrew (Andy)
Ashley wrote:
Could be an option but I’m guessing that AS100 will then
only have a partial table from AS200?
Which works out fine, since you say AS100 prefers the full
table from AS300, and does not prefer AS200 for the same.
I feel
Hi all,
Catalyst 3560/3750 /G/E switches seem to implement L3 interfaces differently
than other switches - they use unique MAC address per every L3 interface.
MAC addresses are assigned from the MACaddr pool in the order how L3
interfaces are created, however after reboot they are assigned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA Software
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20141008-asa
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2014 October 8 16:00 UTC (GMT)
Summary
+==
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software is affected by the following
The way I've dealt with this in the past (a trick I learned from Barry)
is to ask for full routes (and no default), filter out ALL prefixes
except for those of associated with a few far away root name servers,
and then generate a default conditional on reachability of at least one
name server. It
All,
(This is vaguely related to my question earlier in the week about ASR capacity)
We use quite a few 6704-10GE blades on our network, and I'm seeing some
random congestion type issues. In some cases, I've made the problem go away
by shuffling ports between blades to spread the load, but I'm
