Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

You can stick a 1x10G SPA in the 1001-X to bring it up to 3x 10G interfaces. There are some caveats, though: the platform's throughput as licensed is only up to 20G; and the SPA uses XFP, as opposed to SFP+ in the built-in 10G ports. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

James Thanks, yes you right like i mention i believe without the mpls, it is not ideal. Bit i manage to figure it out the way you mention i guess. Here is my attempt. 1. I use L2 failover between the PE with HSRP on some VLAN on one PE as priority and some on other VLAN on the other PE this is

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

Ahh you meant NAT on the 920. - It is supported on one model only I think the ASR920-12SZ-IM. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Cutting Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:40 PM To: Tim Cooper ; cisco-nsp NSP

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

> From: Maile Halatuituia > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:35 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: VRF-Lite between PE > > > Hi > > > I have this scenario. > > > CUSTOMER PE1 --- PE2 CUSTOMER > || > > >

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

?somebody ??? From: Maile Halatuituia Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:35 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: VRF-Lite between PE Hi I have this scenario. CUSTOMER PE1 --- PE2 CUSTOMER |

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

It's not on the feature list page - but is supported at line rate. There are some limitations for NAT + VRF, but that is also supported.

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

> On 24 Oct 2016, at 17:08, Nick Cutting wrote: > > ASR920 with licensing (apparently Netflow now supported) - 1/4 price of 1001-X > Nexus 2nd gen 9k - 93180YC-EX Switch (s-flow support) - 1/3 price of 1001-X But no NAT. ___

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

BTW, neither Nick's nor my suggestion will take full internet Ipv4 routes by default although the N9K will take a max of 896k routes fully configured. That doesn't leave much head room with Ipv4 + ipv6 routes taking ~650k now. Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

ASR920 with licensing (apparently Netflow now supported) - 1/4 price of 1001-X Nexus 2nd gen 9k - 93180YC-EX Switch (s-flow support) - 1/3 price of 1001-X -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Huff Sent: Monday, October 24,

Re: [c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

What about Nexus 3524 (Doesn't support ipv6 or sflow/netflow though), but does low-latency multicast and line rate with BGP and nat. If you need ipv6 look at some of the other nexus 30xx switches. Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations   | Purchase, NY

[c-nsp] looking to find the best cisco device

Dear expert I’m having a look to a scenario in order to find the best matching (and cheapest) device. I need at least 3 x 10 Gbs interface (one in ingress and 2 in egress port-channel) and to support functionalities such as: - BGP - Mcast PIM - Mcast proxy register - NAT - 10 Gbs

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Netflow ifIndex Value (dpidx)

Hi, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 07:46:50AM +, Nigel Hendrickse wrote: > It turns out that the ifIndex value embedded in the Netflow data is not the > SNMP ifIndex (which our collector expects) but a 'dpidx' value which seems to > be a Cisco-proprietary value generated by the platform. Has

[c-nsp] ASR920 Netflow ifIndex Value (dpidx)

Hi, Busy testing Netflow support on the ASR920 (ASR-920-24SZ-M) using the new asr920-universalk9_npe.03.18.00.SP.156-2.SP-ext.bin image. Although the device is exporting Netflow data, for some reason our collector was failing to display any per-interface Netflow stats. It turns out that the