On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 05:26, Igor Sukhomlinov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
Hi Igor
> I wonder if anyone has experience with integrating a UMMT/Seamless
> MPLS domain (BGP-LU running over isolated IGP regions) with an
> existing flat LDP network.
>
> The customer wants to make sure the existing LDP
Even better to get rid of transport MPLS all together ... There is nothing
in LDP MPLS which would be of any value as compared with basic IP UDP
encap. Of course you can still run all of your L3VPNs or EVPNs if you wish
so over IP transport.
Then you no longer need to carry 1000s of /32s in your
> Igor Sukhomlinov
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:23 AM
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if anyone has experience with integrating a UMMT/Seamless MPLS
> domain (BGP-LU running over isolated IGP regions) with an existing flat
LDP
> network.
>
Yes from well before the term was coined, but that was for
> Robert Hass
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 2:36 PM
>
> Hi
> I need to build new core network. We have 6 site's in different cities.
All cities
> are connected over 100G (provided by ISP).
>
> I just thinking about N9K-C93180YC-FX and N9K-C93240YC-FX2 switches.
> - both supports 6 and 12 x 100G
Hi,
I have a following very simple network topology:
CISCO1921[Gi0/0] <-> [eno3]svr
Gi0/0 in Cisco 1921 ISR has 10.66.66.2/24 configured and eno3 in Linux
server has 10.66.66.1/24 configured. RTT on this link is 10ms:
svr$ ping -qc 100 -I 10.66.66.1 10.66.66.2
PING 10.66.66.2 (10.66.66.2) from
