Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

28.09.2020 20:00, Aaron wrote: > Unfortunately no. Thanks! In case someone's curious, I did it at 7:00 early in the morning, the whole thing lasted for 30 seconds with 100% load of CPU processing 352KB of incremental configuration pre-loaded to flash: device and then applied with: copy

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

28.09.2020 20:00, Aaron wrote: > Unfortunately no. Funny thing, I had very old sub-interface created just for testing: interface GigabitEthernet0/1.2239 encapsulation dot1Q 2239 xconnect X.X.X.X 239 encapsulation l2tpv3 manual pw-class MyPeer l2tp id 239 239 l2tp cookie local 4 239 l2tp

Re: [c-nsp] logging suppress duplicates

Logging discriminators have been hit or miss for us for as long as I can remember (and flat-out doesn't work in some versions of IOS). We have had more success with TCL filters which you might want to try. Eg; file flash:YOURFILTER.tcl if [string match "by\ snmp$" $::orig_msg] { return "" }

Re: [c-nsp] logging suppress duplicates

28.09.2020 16:14, Ian Henderson wrote: > On 28 Sep 2020, at 1:38 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> >> Is it possible to enable suppression of duplicate lines in the logging >> buffer? >> Less preferably, disable this kind of messages altogether if it ends with >> "by snmp" or even "from X.X.X.X by

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

Unfortunately no. On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:50 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 28.09.2020 17:12, James Bensley wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein > wrote: > >> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses > only two, > >> one for IP uplink and another

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

28.09.2020 17:12, James Bensley wrote: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only two, >> one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple >> sub-interfaces named like

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Hi! > > One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only two, > one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple > sub-interfaces named like GigabitEthernet0/1.10 (encapsulation dot1Q). > > It

Re: [c-nsp] logging suppress duplicates

On 28 Sep 2020, at 1:38 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Is it possible to enable suppression of duplicate lines in the logging buffer? > Less preferably, disable this kind of messages altogether if it ends with "by > snmp" or even "from X.X.X.X by snmp”. The term you’re looking for to filter

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

28.09.2020 15:20, c...@marenda.net wrote: > > I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] . > > Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports > while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel > ethernetcontrollerchip > (with gig+(only)fas they

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] . Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel ethernetcontrollerchip (with gig+(only)fas they try tonot oversubscribe the internal pci bus ) >

[c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

Hi! One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses only two, one for IP uplink and another as client-sided downlink with multiple sub-interfaces named like GigabitEthernet0/1.10 (encapsulation dot1Q). It need reconfiguration to use 2x1G port-channles. I already did such