Re: [c-nsp] vPC members use identical virtual addresses without HSRP

Cisco support VRRP as well. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 18, 2024, at 10:08 PM, Chen Jiang via cisco-nsp > wrote: > > Hi! Experts > > I wonder if Cisco support vPC members use identical virtual addresses as > host's layer 3 gateway? > > Just like Arista or Juniper, > > Arista for example:

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7k Upgrade Path

ard. > > As Mike mentioned, if an stp change occurs it will rollback the ISSU. > >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 21:39 Michael Lee <fwis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Make sure use short lacp timeout, no spanning-tree change during the upgrade >> >> Also boot

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7k Upgrade Path

Make sure use short lacp timeout, no spanning-tree change during the upgrade Also boot disk array status Mike Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 23, 2018, at 4:16 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:06 AM Justin M. Streiner > wrote: >

[c-nsp] ASA for IPv6

Hi, Currently I have ASA 5580 with IPv4 NAT setup (public IP outside and RFC 1918 inside), I am considering to run IPv6 with Public IPv6 outside and Public IPv6 inside (routing mode) Just wondering there is anything I would need to consider except CPU, memory and sessions) Thanks, ~mike

[c-nsp] VPN firewall

Hello, Anyone has any recommendation for 5-10g performance 3des VPN firewalls? Not udp throughput.. Thanks, Regards -mike ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] find window's machine from Cisco Router

maybe setup an acl for port range 137 to 139 with log then check on the logg On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Imran K guru...@gmail.com wrote: As stated by other posters, the best passive way to determine this is via stack operations. ( sequencing, etc ), which is best done off router due to

Re: [c-nsp] ASA, FWSM

I don't think it is virtual context? There are some limiltations Regards -mike On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Renelson Panosky wrote: By any chance does anybody here know the new terminology used for ASA and FWSM?

Re: [c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question

did you try enable nsf if it is possible? there are some limitation on mpls-te On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote: Hi there. We have 7606's with dual Sup720-3BXL. I'm investigating how to get the fastest possible failover if/when a supervisor fails.

[c-nsp] qos on standard ethernet port for me3750

Hello: Did anyone have experiences with QoS on ME3750 standard port (not ES port), it looks like that it does not support CBWFQ, how about SRR and priority queueing, is priority queue on the first queue? thx, ~mike ___ cisco-nsp mailing list