--- Begin Message ---
I don't think you can do VPDN on 7600. I'm sure we looked at this a couple of
years ago and it is not supported and doesn't work (do it on 7200 or ASR
instead).
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11126991/7600-and-pptp
From: Lukas Tribus
--- Begin Message ---
Hi James,
Do you have any idea what IOS version you had on your lab 7600 that you put the
config on ?
I've got 15.3(3)S6 on the box I'm testing on and whilst the commands exist:
Router(config)#interface ?
...
vasileftVasiLeft interface
vasiright
--- Begin Message ---
VASI is only on IOS-XE is it not ?
- Original Message -
From: James Bensley
To: Cisco Network Service Providers
Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2016, 19:35
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
You can use
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
I have a 7609 with 15.2(4) software on it and both ES+ & WS-X6516 cards in it.
Historically (prior to ES+ cards) to get traffic between VRF's we had a cable
from the 6516 card to another box right beside the 7609 and we ran a VLAN
across this cable with one end
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
Following on from a comment in a recent thread about QoS on an EtherChannel on
ASR...
At this point in time most of our gear is 7600's running ES20+ cards (IOS is
15.2.something). In an effort to provide redundancy we would like to use
port-channels (LAG,
--- Begin Message ---
In the past I have used a qos policy that "does nothing" to monitor the
traffic. It at least lets me see the number of bytes that matched each DSCP,
even if not being able to see in real time what is in the queues. The one below
only shows CS3 traffic, but you would just
--- Begin Message ---
Looks like CR/LF got mangled in my previous reply attempt, trying again...
=
In the past I have used a qos policy that "does nothing" to monitor the
traffic. It at least lets me see the number of bytes that matched each DSCP,
even if not being able to see in real time
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I'd have to agree with the other couple of responses thus far.
We run 7600's around the place and our current planning focus is on what we're
going to be migrating TO (away from 7600) in the next 12-18 months. Having said
that, we have put in one or two additional
Behalf Of Jeremy
Bresley
Sent: 23 September 2015 14:24
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs ISR4000
On 9/23/2015 2:24 AM, Tony via cisco-nsp wrote:
Both of those options are quite probably overkill for what you've described. If
a 2811 is currently doing what you need
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Michael,
Both of those options are quite probably overkill for what you've described. If
a 2811 is currently doing what you need in the deployment and the only change
is an increase in speed, just go with the next step up. For what you've
described a 2911 would easily
It looks really funky, but quite pricey from what I can
see:http://liveaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/LiveAction-Product-Update-for-Cisco.pdf
Not sure I could justify half to three quarter $m on NMS.
From the same PDF, also looks like it might not do so well supporting some of
the gear
Hi Michael,
I don't know about the ability to provision IPSec on a secondary IP address on
the router, but given you could pick up another 2801 for about $100 why not
grab one, configure it up on your new IP address and cut things over in a more
controlled fashion. You can move one tunnel at a
Hi John,
Yes, mfib = multicast FIB.
Are the boxes in question running multicast ? (hint: show run | i multicast)
What were the previous tickets about (or opened for) ?
I'm not sure why they would be used for anything other than troubleshooting
multicast traffic, it could be specific to a
13 matches
Mail list logo