Hi
there are no errors on both interfaces (Cisco and Juniper).
here following logs of one event on both side, config and LACP stats.
LOGS of one event time 16:39:
CISCO
2024 Feb 9 16:39:36 NEXUS1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN:
Interface port-channel101 is down (No operational
DC technicians states cable are the same in both DCs and direct, no patch
panel
Cheers
Il giorno dom 11 feb 2024 alle ore 11:20 nivalMcNd d
ha scritto:
> Can it be DC1 is connecting links over an intermediary patch panel and you
> face fibre disturbance? That may be eliminated if your
yes same version
currently no traffic exchange is in place, just BGP peer setup
no traffic
Il giorno dom 11 feb 2024 alle ore 11:16 Igor Sukhomlinov <
dvalinsw...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi James,
>
> Do you happen to run the same software on all nexuses and all MXes?
> Do the DC1 and DC2 bgp
Hi
One think I've omit to say is that BGP is over a LACP with currently just
one interface 100 Gbs.
I see that the issue is triggered on Cisco when eth interface seems to go
in Initializing state:
2024 Feb 9 16:39:36 NEXUS1 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN:
Interface
Can it be DC1 is connecting links over an intermediary patch panel and you
face fibre disturbance? That may be eliminated if your interfaces on DC1
links do not go down
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024, 21:16 Igor Sukhomlinov via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Do you happen to
Hi James,
Do you happen to run the same software on all nexuses and all MXes?
Do the DC1 and DC2 bgp session exchange the same amount of routing updates
across the links?
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024, 21:09 james list via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Dear experts
> we have a couple
Dear experts
we have a couple of BGP peers over a 100 Gbs interconnection between
Juniper (MX10003) and Cisco (Nexus N9K-C9364C) in two different datacenters
like this:
DC1
MX1 -- bgp -- NEXUS1
MX2 -- bgp -- NEXUS2
DC2
MX3 -- bgp -- NEXUS3
MX4 -- bgp -- NEXUS4
The issue we see is that
