Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
i am doing some automation on that platform and just realized that week On Thursday, September 10, 2020, Nick Cutting wrote: > Nexus has it right - everything is "E" > > > From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of > aar...@gvtc.com > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 5:58 PM > To: 'Nick Hilliard' > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming > > This message originates from outside of your organisation. > > Juniper was good with port id's until the MX204 :) > > Now XE doesn't always mean 10 gig > > set interfaces xe-0/1/4 gigether-options speed 1g > > agould@dallas-204-1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 | grep speed > Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9216, MRU: 9224, LAN-PHY mode, > Speed: 10Gbps, BPDU Error: None, > Speed Configuration: 1G > > -aaron > > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp ps://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/j-_eCzmZNsRQxEHgvzZs?domain=puck.nether.net > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/oxvvCAn47H9LnBfYRor0?domain=puck.nether.net> > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
Nexus has it right - everything is "E" From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of aar...@gvtc.com Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 5:58 PM To: 'Nick Hilliard' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming This message originates from outside of your organisation. Juniper was good with port id's until the MX204 :) Now XE doesn't always mean 10 gig set interfaces xe-0/1/4 gigether-options speed 1g agould@dallas-204-1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 | grep speed Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9216, MRU: 9224, LAN-PHY mode, Speed: 10Gbps, BPDU Error: None, Speed Configuration: 1G -aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/j-_eCzmZNsRQxEHgvzZs?domain=puck.nether.net> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/<https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/oxvvCAn47H9LnBfYRor0?domain=puck.nether.net> ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
Juniper was good with port id's until the MX204:) Now XE doesn't always mean 10 gig set interfaces xe-0/1/4 gigether-options speed 1g agould@dallas-204-1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 | grep speed Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9216, MRU: 9224, LAN-PHY mode, Speed: 10Gbps, BPDU Error: None, Speed Configuration: 1G -aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
On 9/10/20 10:24, Doug McIntyre wrote: The NBASE-T speeds are popular in WiFi AP as the speeds one could get under ideal circumstances started pushing over 1G limits. The inclusion of POE with NBASE-T also helps on the AP use case. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
aar...@gvtc.com wrote on 10/09/2020 17:16: 000.1 - Fa 050 - Fi 040 - Fo 400 - F 001 - Gi 100 - Hu 010 - Te 025 - TF 200 - TH if there were a fundamental difference between these interface types, the naming differentiation might be useful, but it's all ethernet. Fortunately, other vendors mostly steered clear of this approach. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:27:34AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 9/10/20 09:16, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > > Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that? > > 802.3bz > > Options for speeds beyond 1Gbps but maybe you can't (cheaply easily > quickly) rip and replace all your building/house cabling to make the > leap to 10GbE. You can do 2.5Gbase-T over Cat5e, for example. Although you can do 10Gbase-T over Cat5e for xx number of small meters as well (I think Arista used to say 20m in general, but not spec'd, and nothing guaranteed). I've done around 12m runs of cat5e on 10Gbase-T without issues, but would usually replace with cat6 in general. But yeah, inwall cabling would generally be too long for that. The NBASE-T speeds are popular in WiFi AP as the speeds one could get under ideal circumstances started pushing over 1G limits. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
On 9/10/20 09:16, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that? 802.3bz Options for speeds beyond 1Gbps but maybe you can't (cheaply easily quickly) rip and replace all your building/house cabling to make the leap to 10GbE. You can do 2.5Gbase-T over Cat5e, for example. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
Interesting... I've never heard of/seen 2.5 gig nor 5 g, geez, what is that? Off topic slightly, I have seen these recently(xr7) RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ios#sh int ? ... FastEthernet FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Fa FiftyGigEFiftyGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Fi FortyGigEFortyGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Fo FourHundredGigE FourHundredGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is F GigabitEthernet GigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Gi HundredGigE HundredGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Hu TenGigE TenGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is Te TwentyFiveGigE TwentyFiveGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is TF TwoHundredGigE TwoHundredGigabitEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) | short name is TH Abbreviations are funny... 000.1 - Fa 050 - Fi 040 - Fo 400 - F 001 - Gi 100 - Hu 010 - Te 025 - TF 200 - TH -Aaron G. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
Good Morning Drew, They are TenGigabitethernet Interfaces: PortNameStatus VlanDuplex Speed Type Te10/0/44 connected xxx a-full a-1000 100/1000/2.5G/5G/10GBaseTX Have a good day, Aaron Aaron Childs Director Infrastructure Services Information Technology Services Wilson Hall - 577 Western Ave. Westfield MA 01086 P 413.572.5527 F 413.572.5615 aa...@westfield.ma.edu -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 11:03 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming Caution External Email: This email originated outside of WSU. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond if it appears to be suspicious. Hi, I have a quirky question about the 9410's Interface naming/numbering. These switches appear to support 1G 2.5G, 5G and 10G interfaces. Do the names of the interfaces change depending on the speed? Is it ethernet1/1/1 no matter what? Or does it change to GigabitEthernet1/1/1 or TenGigabitEthernet1/1/1 depending on how it's configured? If anyone knows I would appreciate it. Thanks, -Drew ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming
Hi, I have a quirky question about the 9410's Interface naming/numbering. These switches appear to support 1G 2.5G, 5G and 10G interfaces. Do the names of the interfaces change depending on the speed? Is it ethernet1/1/1 no matter what? Or does it change to GigabitEthernet1/1/1 or TenGigabitEthernet1/1/1 depending on how it's configured? If anyone knows I would appreciate it. Thanks, -Drew ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
